Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: League of United Latin American Citizens

2001-2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
William Tauzin II 11%
Lee Terry 11%
TX U.S. House 13 Mac Thornberry Republican 11%
OH U.S. House 12 Pat Tiberi Republican 11%
PA U.S. Senate Jr Pat Toomey Republican 11%
MI U.S. House 6 Fred Upton Republican 11%
OR U.S. House 2 Greg Walden Republican 11%
Zach Wamp 11%
David Weldon 11%
Frank Wolf 11%
Bill Young 11%
Jeff Miller 10%
Richard Hugh Baker 6%
Roscoe Bartlett 6%
Douglas Bereuter 6%
MO U.S. Senate Jr Roy Blunt Republican 6%
TX U.S. House 8 Kevin Brady Republican 6%
Dan Burton 6%
Dave Camp 6%
Chris Cannon 6%
Howard Coble 6%
Christopher Cox 6%
Ander Crenshaw 6%
Barbara Cubin 6%
TX U.S. House 7 John Culberson Republican 6%
Jo Ann Davis 6%
GA Governor Nathan Deal Republican 6%
Thomas DeLay 6%
James DeMint 6%
Jennifer Dunn 6%
SC U.S. Senate Sr Lindsey Graham Republican 6%
Duncan Hunter 6%
OK U.S. Senate Sr Jim Inhofe Republican 6%
GA U.S. Senate Sr Johnny Isakson Republican 6%
CA U.S. House 49 Darrell Issa Republican 6%
TX U.S. House 3 Sam Johnson Republican 6%
Richard Keller 6%
Mark Kennedy 6%
Jack Kingston 6%
Jon Kyl 6%
James McCrery III 6%
CO Commissioner 2 Scott McInnis 6%
John Mica 6%
Gary Miller 6%
Sue Myrick 6%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 6%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 6%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 6%
Joe Pitts 6%
Todd Platts 6%
George Radanovich 6%
James Ramstad 6%
Denny Rehberg 6%
CA U.S. House 48 Dana Rohrabacher Republican 6%
John Shadegg 6%
IL U.S. House 15 John Shimkus Republican 6%
TX U.S. House 21 Lamar Smith Republican 6%
John Sununu 6%
Charles Taylor 6%
David Vitter 6%
MS U.S. Senate Jr Roger Wicker Republican 6%
AK U.S. House At-Large Donald Young Republican 6%
Eric Cantor 0%
OH U.S. House 1 Steve Chabot Republican 0%
Randy Forbes 0%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Doc Hastings 0%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 0%
John Linder 0%
Don Nickles 0%
Mike Rogers 0%
CA U.S. House 39 Ed Royce Republican 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top