Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Arizona Chamber of Commerce

1997 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Linda Aguirre 60%
Donald Aldridge 92%
Carolyn Allen 92%
Mark Anderson 85%
David Armstead 32%
Gus Arzberger 74%
Keith Bee 74%
Debra Brimhall 80%
Jack Brown 72%
Scott Bundgaard 91%
Brenda Burns 92%
Robert Burns 96%
Carmine Cardamone 40%
James Carruthers 73%
Ken Cheuvront 44%
Edward Cirillo 96%
Harry Clark 39%
Pat Conner 96%
Dean Cooley 85%
Chris Cummiskey 64%
George Cunningham 72%
Lori Daniels 92%
Ann Day 80%
David Eberhart 96%
Brian Fagin 58%
Franklin Flake 88%
Kathi Foster 39%
Tom Freestone 84%
Michael Gardner 92%
Susan Gerard 72%
Lowell Gleason 92%
Randall Gnant 76%
Sue Grace 88%
Linda Gray 92%
Jeff Groscost 90%
Art Hamilton 50%
Benjamin Hanley 19%
Joe Hart 84%
Mary Hartley 42%
James Henderson, Jr. 71%
Winifred Hershberger 81%
Tom Horne 76%
Herschella Horton 46%
John Huppenthal 88%
Jack Jackson, Sr. 47%
Marilyn Jarrett 88%
Karen Johnson 81%
John Kaites 88%
Sandra Kennedy 35%
Laura Knaperek 96%
Richard Kyle 81%
Barbara Leff 88%
Joe Eddie Lopez 33%
John Loredo 44%
Sue Lynch 68%
Wesley Marsh 86%
W. A. McGibbon 92%
Jean McGrath 88%
Robert McLendon 54%
Paul Newman 54%
Andy Nichols 50%
Debora Norris 42%
Jerry Overton 78%
Thomas Patterson 96%
David Petersen 96%
Marion Pickens 50%
Lou-Ann Preble 77%
Elaine Richardson 48%
Gary Richardson 92%
Elise Salinger 52%
Dan Schottel 73%
Robin Shaw 89%
Tom Smith 92%
Ruth Solomon 75%
Victor Soltero 60%
Marc Spitzer 96%
Carol Springer 96%
Lela Steffey 96%
Ramon Valadez 46%
John Verkamp 63%
Roberta Voss 85%
Christine Weason 42%
Jim Weiers 88%
John Wettaw 76%
Barry Wong 88%
AZ State House 3 Sally Ann Gonzales Democratic 38%
AZ Supervisor 1 Peter Rios Democratic 36%
AZ State House 27 Rebecca Rios Democratic 42%
AZ State House 25 Rusty Bowers Republican 92%
AZ State Senate 14 Gail Griffin Republican 88%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top