Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Missouri National Federation of Independent Business

2001-2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
MO Alderman Ward 11 Thomas Villa 67%
MO Commissioner At-Large John Griesheimer 100%
MO State Board of Education Charles Shields 100%
Mark Abel 67%
Frank Barnitz 50%
Matt Bartle 100%
Carl Bearden 100%
Robert Behnen 83%
Lanie Black III 100%
Craig Bland 67%
Mary Groves Bland 20%
Amber Boykins 50%
Joan Bray 80%
Sharon Sanders Brooks 60%
Richard Byrd 83%
Marsha Campbell 67%
Russ Carnahan 67%
Harold Caskey 57%
John Cauthorn 100%
Norma Champion 100%
Doyle Childers 71%
Shannon Cooper 100%
Larry Crawford 83%
Jane Cunningham 100%
Melba Curls 80%
Michael Daus 60%
Dahlman Davis 50%
Tom Dempsey 100%
Jonathan Dolan 100%
Patrick Dougherty 57%
Kathlyn Fares 100%
Bill Foster 100%
Barbara Fraser 67%
Thomas George 67%
Michael Gibbons 100%
Wayne Goode 43%
Charles Graham 67%
Thomas Green 67%
Charles Gross 100%
Mark Hampton 50%
Catherine Hanaway 100%
Esther Hill Haywood 80%
Robert Hilgemann 67%
Steve Hunter 100%
Kenneth Jacob 43%
Rodney Jetton 100%
Connie Johnson 67%
Richard Johnson 67%
Cathy Jolly 67%
Gary Kelly 50%
Van Kelly 83%
Harry Kennedy 40%
Peter Kinder 86%
Jerry King 83%
David Klindt 100%
Maurice Lawson 60%
John William Loudon 100%
Jenee Lowe 67%
B. J. Marsh 80%
James Mathewson 50%
Bob May 100%
Robert Mayer 80%
Ryan McKenna 67%
Ronnie Miller 83%
Danielle Moore 83%
Peter Myers, Jr. 100%
Susan Phillips 67%
Charles Portwood 100%
Chuck Purgason 83%
Edward Quick 50%
John Quinn 80%
Bill Ransdall 67%
Rex Rector 83%
Annie Reinhart 100%
Bradley Roark 83%
John Russell 71%
Delbert Scott 83%
James Seigfreid 50%
Harold Selby 67%
Chris Shoemaker 80%
Wes Shoemyer 40%
Trent Skaggs 83%
Sarah Steelman 100%
Stephen Stoll 57%
Neal St. Onge 100%
Betty Thompson 67%
Merrill Townley 67%
Carl Vogel 83%
Wes Wagner 67%
Juanita Walton 67%
Dan Ward 50%
James Whorton 40%
Philip Willoughby 67%
Vicky Riback Wilson 67%
Yvonne Wilson 67%
Mark Wright 83%
Anita Yeckel 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top