Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Rifle Association

2016 Candidate Positions on Gun Rights

Issues: Guns
State Office District Name Party Rating
Brian Alston 0%
Mark Alterici 21%
Pamela Althoff 71%
Ramiro Alvarado 0%
Cesar Alvarez 0%
Jaime Alvarez 0%
Steven Alves 0%
Michele Alvine 0%
Anne Amadon 86%
Tony Amador 86%
George Ambler 71%
Bo Ambrozewicz 43%
Bill Amerman 43%
Keith Ammon 93%
Dale Amorosia 0%
Kameshea Amos 0%
Michael Amrozowicz 0%
Mark Amsdell 86%
Myron Amsden 43%
Charles Amsterdam 0%
Mike Anaya 0%
Ira Anders 21%
Samuel Anders 0%
Emily Andersen 0%
Johan Andersen 0%
Katie Andersen 0%
Ash Anderson 0%
Ben Anderson 0%
Brent Anderson 0%
Chad Anderson 64%
Clinton Anderson 0%
Dale Anderson II 86%
Dave Anderson 0%
Paul Anderson 93%
Dick Anderson 86%
Elliot Anderson 43%
Eric Anderson 7%
Jody Anderson 0%
John Anderson 0%
Josh Anderson 0%
Keith Anderson 0%
Lisa Anderson 0%
Mike Anderson 0%
Rodney Anderson 93%
Rubin Anderson 86%
Samuel Anderson 64%
Sarah Anderson 93%
Scott Anderson 0%
Shalyn Anderson 7%
Sharon Anderson 0%
William Anderson 0%
Steven Andersson 93%
David Andes 36%
Mark Andre 0%
Ashley Andreas 0%
Teresita Andres 0%
Franklin Andrew 86%
Deb Andrews 0%
Drew Andrews 0%
Robert Andrews, Jr. 0%
Elaine Andrews-Ahearn 7%
John Andrysiak 0%
Leon Angelichio 0%
Scott Angelle 93%
Nick Angelo II 0%
Brian Angevine 0%
Sharron Angle 93%
Marlene Anielski 93%
Dario Anselmo 0%
Steven Anthimides 93%
Mike Anthony 93%
Peter Antinozzi 0%
Ken Anton 0%
San Antonio 21%
Mike Antonovich 86%
Carl Anuszczyk 0%
Tom Anzelc 93%
Steven Appel 0%
Hoguen Apperson 0%
Winston Apple 0%
Jon Applebaum 43%
Michael Appleby 0%
Doug Applegate 0%
Andrew Apsley 0%
Tracy Arakaki 0%
Julia Arata-Fratta 0%
Nelson Araujo 21%
Alan Arcand 86%
Angel Arce 7%
Louis Archuleta 0%
Sylvia Arcouette 0%
Scottie Ard 21%
Thomas Ardinger 86%
Robert Ardini 0%
Velma Arellano 86%
Diana Arévalo 0%
Evangelos Argyrakis 36%
Francis Arias 0%
Bill Armbrust 21%
Victor Armendariz 0%
Paulette Armstead 0%
Charles Armstrong 21%
Derek Armstrong 93%
Eddie Armstrong III 21%
Stella Armstrong 43%
Phillips Armstrong, Sr. 7%
Brice Arndt 43%
Mark Arness 86%
Jeff Arnold 0%
Lloyd Arnold 100%
Ryan Arnold 0%
Ryan Arnt 86%
Tom Arpke 93%
Lorenzo Arredondo 86%
Katie Arrington 86%
Beth Reever Arsenault 21%
Sandy Arseneault 0%
Gerard Arthus 0%
Frank Artiles 100%
Carden Arvon 93%
Tom Asbridge 64%
Robert Asencio 0%
Jim Ash 86%
Sean Ashby 7%
Dean Asher 86%
Brad Ashford 29%
Michael Ashford 7%
Bob Ashley 71%
Bruce Ashworth 0%
James Ashworth 0%
Matthew Ashworth 0%
Syed Asif 0%
Abdimalik Askar 0%
Iskandar Atajanow 0%
James Atchison 79%
Brantley Atchley 43%
Ralph Atchue 0%
George Athanasopoulos 86%
Kelly Atherton 79%
Bert Atkins 0%
Cory Atkins 21%
Ken Atkins 86%
Kelvin Atkinson 43%
Tom Atkinson 86%
Todd Atwater 93%
Nick Atwood 64%
Tracy Atwood 0%
Alvin Au 0%
Bob Aubin III 0%
Felicia Augevich 0%
Molly Augustine 0%
Scott Aumuller 0%
Clay Aurand 93%
Todd Ausborn 86%
Christopher Austin 71%
Donald Austin 0%
Kevin Austin 93%
John Austinson 0%
Ken Auvil 0%
Brad Avakian 7%
Kevin Avard 93%
Tony Avella 7%
Arlene Avery 0%
Antonio Avila 86%
Marilyn Avila 64%
Paul Avila 0%
Karen Awana 79%
Tyler Axness 57%
Gilbert Ayala 86%
Jessica Ayala 0%
Candace Ayars 0%
Claire Ayer 64%
Kelly Ayotte 79%
Darren Ayoub 0%
Louis Azar 0%
Gary Azarian 71%
Henri Azibert 0%
Naveed Aziz 0%
Jim Azzola 86%
Mike Babcock 71%
Brett Baber 86%
Paul Babeu 93%
Gregory Babinec 86%
Anthony Baca 86%
Joe Baca, Sr. 79%
Mary Kay Bacallao 86%
Kathleen Bachiochi 0%
Daniel Bacon, Jr. 64%
Barbara Baer 7%
Daisy Baez 0%
Howie Bagley 86%
Nikki Bagley 86%
Jermaine Bagnall-Graham 0%
Cal Bahr 64%
Kurt Bahr 93%
Brad Bailey 93%
Carol Bailey 0%
Kent Bailey 21%
Raymond Bailey, Sr. 0%
Rich Bailey 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top