Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Education Association

2000 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Timothy Roemer 100%
Steve Rothman 100%
Marge Roukema 33%
Jim Ryun 0%
Martin Olav Sabo 100%
Loretta Sanchez 100%
Max Sandlin, Jr. 100%
Rick Santorum 0%
Paul Sarbanes 100%
Thomas Sawyer 100%
Jim Saxton 33%
Joe Scarborough 0%
Robert Schaffer 50%
John Shadegg 0%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 66%
Christopher Shays 33%
Donald Sherwood 66%
Ronnie Shows 100%
Joseph Skeen 33%
Ike Skelton 100%
Gordon Smith 20%
Nick Smith 0%
Bob Smith 0%
Olympia Snowe 60%
Vic Snyder 100%
Mark Souder 0%
Arlen Specter 0%
Floyd Spence, Sr. 33%
John Spratt, Jr. 100%
Pete Stark 66%
Cliff Stearns 0%
Charles Stenholm 100%
Ted Stevens 0%
Ted Strickland 100%
Bob Stump 33%
Bart Stupak 100%
John Sununu 33%
John Sweeney 33%
Tom Tancredo 0%
John Tanner 100%
Ellen Tauscher 100%
William Tauzin II 33%
Charles Taylor 33%
Gene Taylor 100%
Lee Terry 0%
Craig Thomas 0%
William Thomas 33%
Fred Thompson 0%
Karen Thurman 66%
Strom Thurmond 0%
Todd Tiahrt 33%
John Tierney 100%
Robert Torricelli 80%
Ed Towns 100%
James Traficant, Jr. 33%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 100%
James Turner 100%
Mark Udall 100%
David Vitter 0%
George Voinovich 20%
James Walsh 0%
Zach Wamp 33%
John Warner 0%
Wesley Watkins 33%
Mel Watt 100%
Julius Caesar Watts, Jr. 33%
Henry Waxman 100%
Anthony Weiner 100%
David Weldon 0%
W. Curtis Weldon 33%
Gerald Weller 33%
Paul Wellstone 100%
Robert Wexler 100%
Ed Whitfield 33%
Heather Wilson 33%
Frank Wolf 33%
Lynn Woolsey 100%
David Wu 100%
Albert Wynn 100%
Bill Young 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top