Rating Group: Council for a Livable World

2000 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 63%
Wayne Allard 0%
Kay Bailey Hutchison 0%
Max Baucus 63%
Evan Bayh 63%
Bob Bennett 0%
Joe Biden, Jr. 75%
Jeff Bingaman 63%
Kit Bond 13%
Barbara Boxer 75%
John Breaux 63%
KS Governor Sam Brownback R 0%
Jim Bunning 0%
Conrad Burns 0%
Robert Byrd 57%
Ben Campbell 0%
Lincoln Chafee 33%
MS U.S. Senate-Sr Thad Cochran R 0%
ME U.S. Senate-Sr Susan Collins R 13%
Kent Conrad 50%
Larry Craig 0%
ID U.S. Senate-Sr Mike Crapo R 0%
Thomas Daschle 63%
OH Attorney General Mike DeWine R 13%
Chris Dodd 63%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 0%
Byron Dorgan 75%
IL U.S. Senate-Sr Dick Durbin D 88%
John Edwards 63%
WY U.S. Senate-Sr Mike Enzi R 0%
Russ Feingold 88%
CA U.S. Senate-Sr Dianne Feinstein D 63%
Peter Fitzgerald 0%
William Frist 0%
Daniel Graham 50%
IA U.S. Senate-Sr Chuck Grassley R 25%
Judd Gregg 0%
Charles Hagel 13%
Tom Harkin 88%
UT U.S. Senate-Sr Orrin Hatch R 0%
Ernest Hollings 75%
OK U.S. Senate-Sr Jim Inhofe R 0%
Daniel Inouye 63%
James Merrill Jeffords 75%
Timothy Johnson 75%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 75%
John Kerry 75%
Herb Kohl 88%
Jon Kyl 13%
Mary Landrieu 75%
Frank Lautenberg 75%
VT U.S. Senate-Sr Patrick Leahy D 100%
Carl Levin 75%
Joe Lieberman 75%
Blanche Lincoln 75%
Trent Lott, Sr. 0%
Dick Lugar 13%
AZ U.S. Senate-Sr John McCain III R 13%
KY U.S. Senate-Sr Mitch McConnell R 0%
Barbara Mikulski 63%
WA U.S. Senate-Sr Patty Murray D 75%
Don Nickles 0%
RI U.S. Senate-Sr Jack Reed D 75%
Harry Reid 88%
KS U.S. Senate-Sr Pat Roberts R 0%
Jay Rockefeller IV 88%
Rick Santorum 13%
Paul Sarbanes 63%
NY U.S. Senate-Sr Chuck Schumer D 63%
NA U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions III R 0%
AL U.S. Senate-Sr Richard Shelby R 0%
Gordon Smith 50%
Olympia Snowe 13%
Arlen Specter 13%
Ted Stevens 0%
Craig Thomas 0%
George Voinovich 13%
John Warner 0%
OR U.S. Senate-Sr Ron Wyden D 88%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.