Rating Group: Council for a Livable World

2000 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
AL U.S. Senate-Sr Richard Shelby R 0%
AZ U.S. Senate-Sr John McCain III R 13%
CA U.S. Senate-Sr Dianne Feinstein D 63%
IA U.S. Senate-Sr Chuck Grassley R 25%
ID U.S. Senate-Sr Mike Crapo R 0%
IL U.S. Senate-Sr Dick Durbin D 88%
KS U.S. Senate-Sr Pat Roberts R 0%
KY U.S. Senate-Sr Mitch McConnell R 0%
ME U.S. Senate-Sr Susan Collins R 13%
NA U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions III R 0%
NY U.S. Senate-Sr Chuck Schumer D 63%
OH Attorney General Mike DeWine R 13%
OK U.S. Senate-Sr Jim Inhofe R 0%
OR U.S. Senate-Sr Ron Wyden D 88%
RI U.S. Senate-Sr Jack Reed D 75%
UT U.S. Senate-Sr Orrin Hatch R 0%
VT U.S. Senate-Sr Patrick Leahy D 100%
WA U.S. Senate-Sr Patty Murray D 75%
WY U.S. Senate-Sr Mike Enzi R 0%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 63%
Wayne Allard 0%
Kay Bailey Hutchison 0%
Max Baucus 63%
Evan Bayh 63%
Bob Bennett 0%
Joe Biden, Jr. 75%
Jeff Bingaman 63%
Kit Bond 13%
Barbara Boxer 75%
John Breaux 63%
Sam Brownback 0%
Jim Bunning 0%
Conrad Burns 0%
Robert Byrd 57%
Ben Campbell 0%
Lincoln Chafee 33%
Thad Cochran 0%
Kent Conrad 50%
Larry Craig 0%
Thomas Daschle 63%
Chris Dodd 63%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 0%
Byron Dorgan 75%
John Edwards 63%
Russ Feingold 88%
Peter Fitzgerald 0%
William Frist 0%
Daniel Graham 50%
Judd Gregg 0%
Charles Hagel 13%
Tom Harkin 88%
Ernest Hollings 75%
Daniel Inouye 63%
James Merrill Jeffords 75%
Timothy Johnson 75%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 75%
John Kerry 75%
Herb Kohl 88%
Jon Kyl 13%
Mary Landrieu 75%
Frank Lautenberg 75%
Carl Levin 75%
Joe Lieberman 75%
Blanche Lincoln 75%
Trent Lott, Sr. 0%
Dick Lugar 13%
Barbara Mikulski 63%
Don Nickles 0%
Harry Reid 88%
Jay Rockefeller IV 88%
Rick Santorum 13%
Paul Sarbanes 63%
Gordon Smith 50%
Olympia Snowe 13%
Arlen Specter 13%
Ted Stevens 0%
Craig Thomas 0%
George Voinovich 13%
John Warner 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.00 but know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a charge of $0.00 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »