Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Measure Details

Concerns the Limitation on State Debt

Washington Ballot Measure - Senate Joint Resolution 8225

Election: Nov. 2, 2010 (General)
Outcome: Passed

Government Budget and Spending


Argument For


Argument Against


    Explanatory Statement

    The Constitutional Provision as it Presently Exists

    Article VIII, section 1, of the Washington Constitution authorizes the state to borrow money, by issuing bonds, notes, and other evidences of indebtedness, to be repaid over time with interest. That provision of the state constitution also sets a limit on the aggregate debt the state may assume. The aggregate debt contracted by the state cannot exceed an amount for which the payments of principal and interest in any fiscal year exceed nine percent of the average general state revenues for the previous three fiscal years. "General state revenues" are defined to include all money received by the state treasury from any source, with certain exceptions. Not all state debt is subject to the debt limit.

    The Effect of the Proposed Amendment if Approved

    The proposed amendment would not change the constitutional debt limit. It would modify the annual calculation used to determine whether the state's debt is within the constitutional limit. The amendment would require the state, in annually calculating the amount required for payment of interest on its general obligation debt, to subtract scheduled federal payments to be received each year in respect of bonds, notes, or other evidences of indebtedness. Under the constitution, the debt the state may issue is based in part on the total amount of the state's annual principal and interest payments. Therefore, subtraction of federal payments to be credited against interest on the debt could affect the amount of aggregate debt that the state may incur.

    Measure Text

    The legislature has proposed a constitutional amendment concerning the limitation on state debt.

    This amendment would require the state to reduce the interest accounted for in calculating the constitutional debt limit, by the amount of federal payments scheduled to be received to offset that interest.

    Should this constitutional amendment be:
    [ ] Approved
    [ ] Rejected

    Skip to top

    Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

    Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

    Back to top