Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Tom Holland's Voting Records on Issue:

Office: State Senate (KS) - District 3, Democratic Agenda Chair

Kansas Key Votes

Date Bill No. Bill Title Outcome Vote
May 11, 2011 SB 129 Amends Voter Identification Requirements Conference Report Rejected - Senate
(15 - 23)
May 8, 2010 HB 2130 Amending Seat Belt Laws Conference Report Adopted - Senate
(29 - 8)
Feb. 19, 2009 SB 59 Enforcing Seat Belt Violations as a Primary Offense Bill Passed - Senate
(23 - 17)
Feb. 17, 2009 SB 25 Statewide Indoor Smoking Ban Bill Passed - Senate
(26 - 13)
May 6, 2008 HB 2019 Voter Identification Conference Report Adopted - House
(67 - 56)
Feb. 14, 2008 HB 2617 Mandatory Drug Testing for Drivers Causing Serious Accidents Bill Passed - House
(117 - 5)
April 3, 2007 HB 2019 Voter Identification Concurrence Vote Failed - House
(61 - 61)
May 10, 2006 HB 2118 Conceal and Carry Conference Report Adopted - House
(93 - 24)
March 23, 2006 SB 418 Concealed Weapons Permits Veto Override Passed - House
(91 - 33)
March 14, 2006 SB 418 Concealed Weapons Permits Bill Passed - House
(90 - 33)

About the Selection and Description of Key Votes

Vote Smart provides easy access to Congressional and state voting records and maintains a collection of key votes grouped by issue. Vote Smart uses the following criteria to select key votes:

  1. The vote should be helpful in portraying how a member stands on a particular issue
  2. The vote should be clear for any person to understand
  3. The vote has received media attention
  4. The vote was passed or defeated by a very close margin
  5. Occasionally, if a specific bill is consistently inquired about on the Voter's Research Hotline, the vote will be added

Vote Smart provides a summary of the version of the bill text associated with each selected key vote. The summary does not necessarily reflect the content of the final version of the bill. Summaries are written by Vote Smart's staff and interns, who adhere to the project's strict policies and procedures in order to guarantee absolute impartiality and accuracy. Each key vote selection is reviewed by the project's community of advisors, who are political scientists and journalists from all fifty states.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top