Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Mark Dayton's Voting Records on Issue:

Office: Governor (MN), Democratic/Farmer/Labor

National Key Votes

Date Bill No. Bill Title Outcome Vote
Nov. 16, 2005 HR 2862 Commerce, Justice and Science Appropriations Bill, FY 2006 Conference Report Adopted - Senate
(94 - 5)
March 8, 2005 S Amdt 47 Violent Protestor Amendment Amendment Rejected - Senate
(46 - 53)
April 22, 2004 S 2329 Victims' Rights Bill Bill Passed - Senate
(96 - 1)
March 25, 2004 HR 1997 Unborn Victims of Violence Act 2004 Bill Passed - Senate
(61 - 38)
June 11, 2002 S 625 Hate Crimes Bill Cloture Not Invoked - Senate
(54 - 43)

Executive Actions

Date Bill No. Bill Title Outcome Vote
May 22, 2015 SF 878 Authorizes Gun Silencers and Expands Ex-Felon Voting Rights Signed - Executive
May 17, 2015 SF 86 Amends Procedures for Data Collected by Police Surveillance Equipment Signed - Executive
March 5, 2012 HF 1467 Expands the Use of Deadly Force in Self-Defense Vetoed - Executive
May 27, 2011 HF 988 Relating to Public Defenders Vetoed - Executive
May 24, 2011 SF 958 Relating to Public Safety Vetoed - Executive

About the Selection and Description of Key Votes

Vote Smart provides easy access to Congressional and state voting records and maintains a collection of key votes grouped by issue. Vote Smart uses the following criteria to select key votes:

  1. The vote should be helpful in portraying how a member stands on a particular issue
  2. The vote should be clear for any person to understand
  3. The vote has received media attention
  4. The vote was passed or defeated by a very close margin
  5. Occasionally, if a specific bill is consistently inquired about on the Voter's Research Hotline, the vote will be added

Vote Smart provides a summary of the version of the bill text associated with each selected key vote. The summary does not necessarily reflect the content of the final version of the bill. Summaries are written by Vote Smart's staff and interns, who adhere to the project's strict policies and procedures in order to guarantee absolute impartiality and accuracy. Each key vote selection is reviewed by the project's community of advisors, who are political scientists and journalists from all fifty states.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top