Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Cory Booker's Ratings and Endorsements

Business and Consumers

2015-2016 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 0%
2015-2016 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 0%
2015-2016 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Petroleum & Natural Gas Positions 0%
2015-2016 National Federation of Independent Business - Pre-Election Report 17%
2015-2016 National Ready Mixed Concrete Association - Lifetime Scores 37%
2015-2016 National Ready Mixed Concrete Association - Positions 37%
2015-2016 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 42%
2015 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions (Lifetime) 50%
2015 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 33%
2015 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 43%
2015 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Cumulative) 40%
2014 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 38%
2014 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Cumulative) 38%
2013-2014 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Metals Service Center Institute - Positions 100%
2013-2014 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (Interim Mid-Year) 100%
2013-2014 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions (113th Congress) 0%
2013-2014 National Small Business Association - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 0%
2013-2014 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions (113th Congress, full session) 100%
2013-2014 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions (113th Congress, first session) 100%
2012-2013 Metals Service Center Institute - Positions (113th Congress, full session) 50%

Campaign Finance and Elections

2016 Common Cause - Positions 46%

Labor Unions

2016 National Treasury Employees Union - Positions 100%
2015 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 100%
2015 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Scores 100%
2015 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%
2015 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2015 International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions 80%
2015 National Treasury Employees Union - Positions 100%
2015 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100%
2014 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 100%
2014 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 100%
2014 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%
2014 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100%
2013-2014 International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Workplace Choice - Positions (113th Congress, full session) 0%
2013-2014 Workplace Choice - Positions 0%
2013 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 50%
2013 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%
2013 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Scores 100%
2013 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score 100%
2013 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2013 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top