Lynne Pancrazi's Special Interest Group Ratings

View 2014 Endorsements
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Business and Consumers

2016 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - 2005-2016 Average Score 17% 2016 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - Positions 22% 2016 Arizona Small Business Association - Positions 100% 2015-2016 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions (State Legislatures) 33% 2015 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - Positions 20% 2015 Arizona Small Business Association - Positions 75% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - 2005-2014 Average Score 17% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - Positions 29% 2013-2014 Arizona National Federation of Independent Business - Positions (Senate) 36% 2013 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - Positions 4% 2013 Arizona Small Business Association - Positions 63% 2012 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - Positions 18 2012 Arizona Small Business Association - Positions 67% 2011-2012 Arizona National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 40% 2011 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - Positions 14 2011 Arizona National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 20% 2010-2011 Arizona Economic Development Practitioners - Positions 50% 2010 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - Positions 6 2009-2010 Arizona National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 62% 2009 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - Positions 30% 2008 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - Positions on Conservative Issues 5 2007-2008 Arizona National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 50% 2007 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - Positions 18

Conservative

2016 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score (State Legislatures) 14% 2016 American Conservative Union - Positions (State Legislatures) 20% 2015 American Conservative Union - Positions (State Legislatures) 15% 2015 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Scores (State Legislatures) 11% 2014 American Conservative Union - Positions (State Legislatures) 8% 2013 Goldwater Institute - Positions 42% 2012 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Regulation 7% 2012 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Constitutional Government 21% 2012 Goldwater Institute - Total Score 21% 2012 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Education 79% 2012 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Tax and Budget 14% 2011 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Education 0% 2011 Goldwater Institute - Total Score 30% 2011 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Tax and Budget 7% 2011 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Constitutional Government 0% 2011 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Regulation 7% 2010 Goldwater Institute - Total Score 39% 2010 Goldwater Institute - Education Score 52% 2010 Goldwater Institute - Constitutional Government Score 35% 2010 Goldwater Institute - Regulation Score 35% 2010 Goldwater Institute - Tax and Budget Score 43% 2009 Goldwater Institute - Total Score 35% 2009 Goldwater Institute - Tax and Budget Score 24% 2009 Goldwater Institute - Regulation Score 39% 2009 Goldwater Institute - Constitutional Government Score 34% 2009 Goldwater Institute - Education Score 57% 2008 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - Positions on Conservative Issues 5 2008 Goldwater Institute - Constitutional Government Score 25% 2008 Goldwater Institute - Regulation Score 34% 2008 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Conservative Issues 34 2008 Goldwater Institute - Education Score 44% 2008 Goldwater Institute - Tax and Budget Score 31% 2007 Goldwater Institute - Positions 34%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.