Monique Davis's Special Interest Group Ratings

View 2016 Endorsements
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Labor Unions

2015 Illinois AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 87% 2015 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions 87% 2015 Technology & Manufacturing Association - Positions 80% 2015 Technology & Manufacturing Association - Lifetime Scores 45% 2014 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions 97% 2014 Illinois AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 87% 2014 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions (Interim) 93% 2014 Technology & Manufacturing Association - Positions 40% 2013-2014 Illinois Manufacturers' Association - Positions 65% 2013 Illinois AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 86% 2013 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions 69% 2013 Technology & Manufacturing Association - Positions 60% 2012 Illinois AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 87% 2012 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions 55% 2012 Technology & Manufacturing Association - Positions 30% 2011-2012 Illinois Manufacturers' Association - Positions 66% 2011 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions 65% 2011 Illinois AFL-CIO - Lifetime 89% 2011 Technology & Manufacturing Association - Positions 20% 2010 Illinois AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 94% 2010 Technology & Manufacturing Association - Positions 40% 2009-2010 Illinois Manufacturers' Association - Positions 61% 2009 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions 95% 2009 Illinois AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 94% 2007 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 83 2005-2006 Technology & Manufacturing Association - Positions on Manufacturers Advocacy 60 2005 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions 100% 2004 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions 100% 2004 Illinois Manufacturers' Association - Positions 50% 2003 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions 100% 2001 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions 95% 1999 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions 92% 1997 Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions 95%

Social

2016 Citizen Action Illinois - Positions 100% 2016 Citizen Action Illinois - Lifetime Score 89% 2015 Citizen Action Illinois - Positions 100% 2015 Citizen Action Illinois - Lifetime Scores 88% 2014 Citizen Action Illinois - Lifetime Score 87% 2014 Citizen Action Illinois - Positions 92% 2013-2014 Illinois Churches in Action on Alcohol and Addiction Problems- ILLCAAAP - Positions 100% 2013 Citizen Action Illinois - Positions 56% 2013 National Association of Social Workers - Illinois Chapter - Positions 90% 2012 Citizen Action Illinois - Cumulative Score 90% 2012 Citizen Action Illinois - Positions 91 2011 Citizen Action Illinois - Cumulative Score 89% 2011 Citizen Action Illinois - Positions 89% 2011 For the Good of Illinois - Positions 0% 2011 National Association of Social Workers - Illinois Chapter - Positions 90% 2010 Citizen Action Illinois - Cumulative Score 89% 2009-2014 Illinois Churches in Action on Alcohol and Addiction Problems- ILLCAAAP - Positions 92% 2009-2010 Citizen Action Illinois - Positions 89% 2008 Citizen Action Illinois - Positions 78 2007 Citizen Action Illinois - Positions on Progressive Policy 94.5 2003 Citizen Action Illinois - Positions 93% 2003 Texas Public Interest Research Group - Positions 100% 2002 Illinois Family Institute - Positions 63% 2001 Citizen Action Illinois - Positions on Progressive Policy 0% 1999-2004 Illinois Churches in Action on Alcohol and Addiction Problems- ILLCAAAP - Positions 83% 1999-2000 Illinois Churches in Action on Alcohol and Addiction Problems- ILLCAAAP - Positions 33% 1998 Illinois Family Institute - Positions 57% 1997-1998 National Association of Social Workers - Illinois Chapter - Positions 100% 1997 Illinois Churches in Action on Alcohol and Addiction Problems- ILLCAAAP - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.