Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Thomas Miller, Jr.'s Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State Senate (MD) - District 27, Democratic President

Business and Consumers

2017 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Lifetime Scores 54%
2017 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 25%
2016 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 40%
2016 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Lifetime Scores 55%
2015-2016 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions(State Legislatures) 50%
2015 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Lifetime Scores 55%
2015 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 60%
2014 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 25%
2014 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Lifetime Scores 55%
2014 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Positions 100
2014 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Floor Score 100
2014 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Lifetime 97%
2013 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Lifetime Scores 56%
2013 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 40%
2013 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Total Score 86%
2013 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Floor Score 86%
2012 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 25%
2012 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Floor Score 100%
2012 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Total Score 100%
2011-2014 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 25%
2011-2014 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions (State Legislatures) 25%
2011 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 11%
2011 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Floor Score 100%
2011 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - Total Score 100%
2010 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 50%
2010 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Lifetime Score 59%
2010 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - House of Delegates Score 100%
2010 Maryland Consumer Rights Coalition - State Senate Score 100%
2009 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 15%
2009 Restaurant Association of Maryland - Positions 33%
2008 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 43%
2008 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Lifetime Scores 62%
2008 Restaurant Association of Maryland - Positions 0%
2007-2010 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 25%
2007-2009 Restaurant Association of Maryland - Cumulative Score 11%
2007 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 38%
2007 Restaurant Association of Maryland - Positions 0%
2006 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 43%
2005 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 50%
2004 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 62%
2003-2004 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 30%
2003 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 50%
2002 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 50%
2001 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 67%
1998-2002 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 60%
1995-1998 Maryland National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 71%

Environment

2016 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2016 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Scores 79%
2015 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Scores 72%
2015 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2014 Environment Maryland - Positions 100%
2014 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2014 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 71%
2013 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 60%
2013 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 70
2012 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 71
2012 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 75
2011 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50
2011 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 71
2010 Environment Maryland - Positions 60%
2010 Environment Maryland - Lifetime Score 71%
2009 Environment Maryland - Lifetime Score 72%
2009 Environment Maryland - Positions 83%
2009 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 72%
2009 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 83%
2008 Environment Maryland - Positions on Environmental Conservation 89
2008 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 89
2007 Environment Maryland - Positions on Environmental Conservation 83
2007 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 83
2006 Environment Maryland - Positions 75%
2005-2006 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 60%
2003-2004 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 92%
2001-2002 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 70%
1999-2000 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 63%
1997-1998 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 88%
1995-1996 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 71%
1991-1994 Maryland League of Conservation Voters - Positions 75%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top