Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Eric Cantor's Ratings and Endorsements

Government Budget and Spending

2014 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 79%
2014 National Treasury Employees Union - Positions 38%
2014 The Club for Growth - Positions 26%
2014 The Club for Growth - Positions (Lifetime) 72%
2013 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 86%
2013 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 75%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 74%
2011 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 73%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 73%
2010 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 91%
2009 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Scores 76%
2009 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 92%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 89%
2008 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 83%
2008 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 73%
2008 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score B
2007 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 89%
2007 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score A
2006 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 61%
2005-2006 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 74%
2005 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 74%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 58%
2005 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 0%
2004 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 68%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 69%
2004 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 25%
2003 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 74%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 64%
2002 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 83%
2002 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 57%
2002 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 17%
2001 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 93%
2001 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 70%
2001 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 36%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top