Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Scott Garrett's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Government Operations

Government Operations

2016 FreedomWorks - Positions 96%
2015 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 96%
2015 FreedomWorks - Positions 90%
2015 The Lugar Center - Bipartisan Index 31%
2014 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 98%
2014 FreedomWorks - Positions 95%
2013-2014 Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence - Brady Gun Violence Lap Dog Rating: Brady Rating 0%
2013-2014 The Lugar Center - Bipartisan Index 28%
2013 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 95%
2011 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 95%
2010 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 98%
2009 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 99%
2009 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Scores 95%
2008 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 92%
2008 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 94%
2007 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 99%
2005-2006 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 94%
2005 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 94%
2005 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 10%
2004 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 97%
2003 Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 89%
2001 New Jersey Public Interest Research Group - Positions 40%
1999 New Jersey Public Interest Research Group - Positions 50%
1998 New Jersey Public Interest Research Group - Positions 33%
1997 New Jersey Public Interest Research Group - Positions 33%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top