Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Jerry Tillman's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State Senate (NC) - District 29, Republican Majority Whip

Environment

2016 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2016 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Scores 30%
2015 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 32%
2015 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2014 Environment North Carolina - Positions 11
2013 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 31%
2013 Environment North Carolina - Positions 0%
2013 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Positions 39%
2013 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2012 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 47%
2012 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 9%
2011 Environment North Carolina - Positions 0%
2011 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 41%
2011 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 53
2011 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 9
2010 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 48%
2010 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Environment North Carolina - Positions 39%
2009-2010 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 55%
2009 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 50%
2009 Environment North Carolina - Positions 42%
2009 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 60%
2008 Environment North Carolina - Positions 50%
2008 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 53%
2007-2008 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 59%
2007 Environment North Carolina - Positions on Environmental Conservation 50
2007 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 67
2006 Environment North Carolina - Positions on Environmental Conservation 56
2006 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50%
2005-2006 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 61%
2005 Environment North Carolina - Positions 57%
2005 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 71%
2003-2004 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 58%
2003 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 33%

Socially Conservative

2016 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score (State Legislatures) 93%
2016 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score (State Legislatures) 93%
2016 American Conservative Union - Positions (State Legislatures) 80%
2016 American Conservative Union - Positions (State Legislatures) 80%
2016 Civitas Action - Positions 75%
2016 Civitas Action - Positions 75%
2015 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Scores (State Legislatures) 95%
2015 American Conservative Union - Positions (State Legislatures) 89%
2015 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Scores (State Legislatures) 95%
2015 American Conservative Union - Positions (State Legislatures) 89%
2014 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2014 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2013 American Conservative Union (North Carolina State Legislature) - Positions 100%
2013 American Conservative Union (North Carolina State Legislature) - Positions 100%
2013 Civitas Action - Positions 94%
2013 Civitas Action - Positions 94%
2011 American Conservative Union (North Carolina State Legislature) - Positions 100
2011 American Conservative Union (North Carolina State Legislature) - Positions 100
2011 Civitas Action - Positions 98%
2011 Civitas Action - Positions 98%
2010 Civitas Action - Positions 60%
2010 Civitas Action - Positions 60%
2009 Civitas Action - Positions 53%
2009 Civitas Action - Positions 53%
2008 Civitas Action - Positions 74%
2008 Civitas Action - Positions 74%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top