Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Marvin Lucas, Jr.'s Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State House (NC) - District 42, Democratic

Environment

2016 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Scores 75%
2015 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 75%
2015 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 70%
2014 Environment North Carolina - Positions 100
2013 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 83%
2013 Environment North Carolina - Positions 100%
2013 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 78%
2013 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Positions 77%
2012 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 76%
2012 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 91%
2011 Environment North Carolina - Positions 100%
2011 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 78%
2011 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 74
2011 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 83
2010 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 74%
2010 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 75%
2009-2010 Environment North Carolina - Positions 80%
2009-2010 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 77%
2009 Environment North Carolina - Positions 82%
2009 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 73%
2009 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 78%
2008 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 71%
2008 Environment North Carolina - Positions 80%
2007-2008 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 66%
2007 Environment North Carolina - Positions on Environmental Conservation 67
2007 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 57
2006 Environment North Carolina - Positions on Environmental Conservation 60
2006 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 63%
2005-2006 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 77%
2005 Environment North Carolina - Positions 78%
2005 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 90%
2003-2004 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 78%
2003 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 75%
2002 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 86%
2001 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 57%

Socially Conservative

2016 American Conservative Union - Positions (State Legislatures) 17%
2016 American Conservative Union - Positions (State Legislatures) 17%
2016 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score (State Legislatures) 20%
2016 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score (State Legislatures) 20%
2016 Civitas Action - Positions 43%
2016 Civitas Action - Positions 43%
2015 American Conservative Union - Positions (State Legislatures) 31%
2015 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Scores (State Legislatures) 21%
2015 American Conservative Union - Positions (State Legislatures) 31%
2015 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Scores (State Legislatures) 21%
2014 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 64%
2014 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 64%
2013 American Conservative Union (North Carolina State Legislature) - Positions 18%
2013 American Conservative Union (North Carolina State Legislature) - Positions 18%
2013 Civitas Action - Positions 32%
2013 Civitas Action - Positions 32%
2011 American Conservative Union (North Carolina State Legislature) - Positions 17
2011 American Conservative Union (North Carolina State Legislature) - Positions 17
2011 Civitas Action - Positions 18%
2011 Civitas Action - Positions 18%
2010 Civitas Action - Positions 12%
2010 Civitas Action - Positions 12%
2009 Civitas Action - Positions 6%
2009 Civitas Action - Positions 6%
2008 Civitas Action - Positions 17%
2008 Civitas Action - Positions 17%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top