Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

John Marty's Ratings and Endorsements

Abortion

2017 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
2016 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
2015 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions[Excused and Present not counted] 0%
2014 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Excused and Present not counted] 0%
2014 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
2013 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
2012 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Factoring excused and no-votes] 0%
2012 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Excused and no-votes not counted] 0%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
2011 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 6%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 100%
2009 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
2008 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions on Pro-Life Policy 0
2008 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 100
2007 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 100
2006 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
2005 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 13%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
2004 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
2003 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
2002 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
2001 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
2000 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
1999 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 13%
1999 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
1998 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 0%
1998 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 100%
1996 Planned Parenthood of Minnesota Advocate - Positions on Reproductive Rights 100%

Business and Consumers

2016 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 67%
2015-2016 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions (State Legislatures) 43%
2015 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 29%
2014 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 0%
2013-2014 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 0%
2013 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 8%
2012 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 29%
2011-2012 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 0%
2010 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 22%
2009 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 15%
2008 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 67
2007-2008 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 13
2007 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 14
2006 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 22%
2005-2006 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 33%
2005 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 25%
2004 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 28%
2003-2004 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 29%
2002 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 20%
2001-2002 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 21%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Labor Policy) 0%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Healthcare Policy) 0%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Environmental Policy) 0%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Education Policy) 0%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%
1999-2000 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 24%
1997-1998 Minnesota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 43%

Labor Unions

2017 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2017 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 94%
2017 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 96%
2016 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2016 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 92%
2016 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2015 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2015 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 81
2015 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 93
2014 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2014 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 87%
2013 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 91%
2013 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 86%
2012 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2012 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 100%
2011 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 91%
2011 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 100%
2010 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 93%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 92%
2010 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 79%
2009 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 86%
2009 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 79%
2009 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 93%
2009 SEIU Minnesota State Council - Positions 91%
2008 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 60
2008 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 87
2007 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 100
2007 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 100
2007 SEIU Minnesota State Council - Positions on Workplace Rights 92%
2006 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2006 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 82%
2005 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2005 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 94%
2004 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 75%
2004 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 80%
2004 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 92%
2003 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2003 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2003 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 91%
2001 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 93%
2001 Minnesota Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Labor Policy) 0%
2000 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 86%
1999 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
1998 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 75%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2008 OutFront Minnesota - Positions 100%

Social

2016 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 25%
2015 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 22%
2015 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Score 9%
2014 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Score 10%
2014 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 39%
2013 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 17%
2012 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Score 9%
2012 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 11%
2011 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 6%
2011 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Score 9%
2010 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Score 9%
2009 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Score 10%
2008 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Scores 11%
2007 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Scores 11%
2006 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Scores 11%
2006 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 20%
2005 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Scores 11%
2004 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Scores 12%
2003-2004 Joint Religious Legislative Coalition - Positions 100%
2003 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 7%
2003 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Scores 13%
2001-2002 Joint Religious Legislative Coalition - Positions 100%
2000 Joint Religious Legislative Coalition - Positions 100%
1999 Joint Religious Legislative Coalition - Positions 100%
1998 Joint Religious Legislative Coalition - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top