Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Kent Eken's Ratings and Endorsements

Abortion

2016 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2015 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions[Excused and Present not counted] 67%
2014 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Excused and Present not counted] 100%
2014 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2013 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 50%
2012 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Excused and no-votes not counted] 100%
2012 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions [Factoring excused and no-votes] 100%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 33%
2011 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 79%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 29%
2009 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2008 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions on Pro-Life Policy 67
2008 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 0
2007 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions on Reproductive Rights 25
2006 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 86%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 25%
2005 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 60%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 50%
2004 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 96%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 0%
2003 Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life - Positions 100%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota - Positions 5%

Labor Unions

2016 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2015 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2015 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 69
2015 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 90
2014 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2014 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 91%
2013 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 80%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 94%
2013 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2013 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 82%
2012 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 88%
2012 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 50%
2011 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 100%
2010 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 80%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 95%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 93%
2010 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 74%
2009 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2009 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2009 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 100%
2009 SEIU Minnesota State Council - Positions 91%
2008 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 100
2008 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 94
2008 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions on Workplace Rights 92
2007 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 100
2007 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 94
2007 SEIU Minnesota State Council - Positions on Workplace Rights 75%
2006 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2006 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 81%
2005 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 80%
2005 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 94%
2004 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2004 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2004 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 77%
2004 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 100%
2003 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 100%
2003 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2003 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 94%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2008 OutFront Minnesota - Positions 42%

Social

2015 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Score 28%
2015 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 33%
2014 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 43%
2014 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Score 31%
2013 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 14%
2012 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 38%
2012 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Score 32%
2011 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Score 31%
2011 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 40%
2010 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Score 30%
2009 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Score 35%
2008 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Scores 37%
2007 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Scores 40%
2006 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 47%
2006 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Scores 46%
2005 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Scores 46%
2004 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Scores 47%
2003-2004 Joint Religious Legislative Coalition - Positions 80%
2003 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Lifetime Scores 50%
2003 Legislative Evaluation Assembly of Minnesota, Inc. - Positions 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top