Please help us! Donate
Dennis Reboletti's Ratings and Endorsements
2014 Endorsements
Filter by Issue:
- down
- Abortion
- Abortion and Reproductive
- Agriculture and Food
- Animals and Wildlife
- Arts, Entertainment, and History
- Business and Consumers
- Campaign Finance and Elections
- Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
- Crime
- Death Penalty
- Defense
- Drugs
- Education
- Employment and Affirmative Action
- Energy
- Environment
- Executive Branch
- Federal, State and Local Relations
- Foreign Affairs
- Gambling and Gaming
- Government Operations
- Guns
- Health and Health Care
- Housing and Property
- Immigration
- Indigenous Peoples
- Judicial Branch
- Labor Unions
- Legislative Branch
- Marriage, Family, and Children
- Military Personnel
- National Security
- Science
- Senior Citizens
- Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
- Stem Cell Research
- Technology and Communication
- Trade
- Transportation
- Unemployed and Low-Income
- Veterans
- Women
Budget, Spending and Taxes
2012 | The Illinois Opportunity Project - Positions | 33% |
2007-2008 | National Taxpayers United of Illinois - Positions | 69% |
Business and Consumers
2013-2014 | Illinois Chamber of Commerce - Positions | 80% |
2013-2014 | Illinois Chamber of Commerce - Overall Score | 80% |
2013-2014 | Illinois National Federation of Independent Business - Positions | 86% |
2012 | The Illinois Opportunity Project - Positions | 33% |
2011-2012 | Illinois Chamber of Commerce - Positions | 80% |
2011-2012 | Illinois National Federation of Independent Business - Positions | 86% |
2009-2010 | Illinois Chamber of Commerce - Positions | 67% |
2009-2010 | Illinois National Federation of Independent Business - Positions | 43% |
2007-2008 | Illinois Chamber of Commerce - Positions | 80% |
2007-2008 | Illinois National Federation of Independent Business - Positions | 100% |
Campaign Finance and Elections
2011-2012 | Independent Voters of Illinois - Positions | 30% |
2009-2010 | Independent Voters of Illinois - Positions | 54% |
2008 | Independent Voters of Illinois - Positions on Open Government | 29 |
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
Conservative
Environment
Housing and Property
2003-2008 | Housing Action Illinois - Lifetime Scores | 77% |
2003-2008 | Housing Action Illinois - Final Scores | 76% |
Labor Unions
2014 | Illinois AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores | 39% |
2014 | Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions (Interim) | 54% |
2014 | Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions | 42% |
2013-2014 | Illinois Manufacturers' Association - Positions | 100% |
2013 | Illinois AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score | 37% |
2013 | Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions | 50% |
2012 | Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions | 31% |
2012 | Illinois AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score | 34% |
2011-2012 | Illinois Manufacturers' Association - Positions | 63% |
2011 | Illinois AFL-CIO - Lifetime | 35% |
2011 | Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions | 55% |
2010 | Illinois AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score | 37% |
2009-2010 | Illinois Manufacturers' Association - Positions | 100% |
2009 | Illinois AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score | 37% |
2009 | Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions | 40% |
2007 | Illinois AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights | 34 |
Marijuana Legalization
2013-2014 | Illinois Churches in Action on Alcohol and Addiction Problems- ILLCAAAP - Positions | 100% |
Religion
2013-2014 | Illinois Churches in Action on Alcohol and Addiction Problems- ILLCAAAP - Positions | 100% |
2009-2014 | Illinois Churches in Action on Alcohol and Addiction Problems- ILLCAAAP - Positions | 92% |
Social
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.