Please help us! Donate
Bill Brewster's Ratings and Endorsements
Filter by Issue:
- down
- Abortion
- Abortion and Reproductive
- Agriculture and Food
- Animals and Wildlife
- Arts, Entertainment, and History
- Business and Consumers
- Campaign Finance and Elections
- Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
- Crime
- Death Penalty
- Defense
- Drugs
- Education
- Employment and Affirmative Action
- Energy
- Environment
- Executive Branch
- Federal, State and Local Relations
- Foreign Affairs
- Gambling and Gaming
- Government Operations
- Guns
- Health and Health Care
- Housing and Property
- Immigration
- Indigenous Peoples
- Judicial Branch
- Labor Unions
- Legislative Branch
- Marriage, Family, and Children
- Military Personnel
- National Security
- Science
- Senior Citizens
- Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
- Stem Cell Research
- Technology and Communication
- Trade
- Transportation
- Unemployed and Low-Income
- Veterans
- Women
Business and Consumers
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
1995-1996 | Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions | 36% |
1995-1996 | National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions | 30% |
Conservative
1996 | American Conservative Union - Positions | 68% |
1996 | National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score | 44% |
1995-1996 | 60 Plus Association - Positions | 34% |
1995-1996 | The John Birch Society - Positions | 53% |
1995 | American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score | 54% |
1995 | American Conservative Union - Positions | 56% |
1994 | American Conservative Union - Positions | 60% |
1993 | American Conservative Union - Positions | 63% |
Defense
1996 | National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy | 55% |
1996 | National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score | 44% |
Employment and Affirmative Action
Entitlements and the Safety Net
1995-1996 | 60 Plus Association - Positions | 34% |
1995-1996 | National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - Positions | 60% |
Fiscally Conservative
1996 | National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score | 46% |
1995 | National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score | 53% |
Fiscally Liberal
Foreign Affairs
Health and Health Care
1995-1996 | AIDS United - Positions | 33% |
1995 | American Public Health Association - Positions | 29% |
Health Insurance
1995-1996 | National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - Positions | 60% |
Higher Education
1995-1996 | American Association of University Women - Positions | 43% |
1995-1996 | United States Student Association - Positions | 56% |
Labor Unions
Liberal
1996 | Americans for Democratic Action - Positions | 25% |
1996 | National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy | 55% |
Religion
1996 | Bread for the World - Positions on Addressing World Hunger | 60% |
1996 | NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions | 29% |
1995-1996 | Christian Coalition of America - Positions | 86% |
1995-1996 | The John Birch Society - Positions | 53% |
Senior Citizens
1995-1996 | 60 Plus Association - Positions | 34% |
1995-1996 | National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions | 60% |
1995-1996 | National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - Positions | 60% |
Socially Conservative
1996 | National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score | 68% |
1996 | National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score | 68% |
1995-1996 | Christian Coalition of America - Positions | 86% |
1995-1996 | Christian Coalition of America - Positions | 86% |
1995-1996 | The John Birch Society - Positions | 53% |
1995-1996 | The John Birch Society - Positions | 53% |
Socially Liberal
Taxes
1995-1996 | 60 Plus Association - Positions | 34% |
1995 | National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score | 53% |
Technology and Communication
1996 | Communications Workers of America - Positions on Workplace Rights | 38% |
Women
1995-1996 | American Association of University Women - Positions | 43% |
1995 | The Woman Activist - Positions | 40% |
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.