Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Rob Portman's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Agriculture and Food

Office: U.S. Senate (OH) - Jr, Republican

Agriculture and Food

2017-2018 American Bakers Association - Positions 100%
2017-2018 American Farm Bureau Federation - "Congressional Scorecard & Voting Record" 100%
2017 Food Policy Action - Positions 0%
2016 National Farmers Union - "Congressional Scorecard" 33%
2015-2016 American Bakers Association - Positions 62%
2015-2016 Food Policy Action - Positions 40%
2015 Food Policy Action - Positions 40%
2014 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 66%
2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 33%
2013-2014 American Bakers Association - Positions 75%
2013-2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 33%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 33%
2012 National Farmers Union - Positions 40%
2011-2012 American Bakers Association - Positions 83%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 33%
2011 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 100%
2003-2004 National Farmers Union - Positions 17%
2002 Vote Hemp - Positions on Industrial Hemp Policy Fence Sitter
2001-2002 Minnesota Farm Bureau - Positions 86%
2001-2002 National Farmers Union - Positions 30%
2001 American Coalition for Ethanol - Positions 100%
2000 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 83%
1999-2000 National Farmers Union - Positions 58%
1998 National Farmers Union - Positions 22%
1997 National Farmers Union - Positions 57%
1996 National Farmers Union - Positions 27%
1995-1996 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 78%
1995 National Farmers Union - Positions 10%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Positions on Agriculture 0%
1994 National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score 25%
1993-1994 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 50%
1993 National Farmers Union - Positions 22%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top