Card image cap

Chris Smith's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Office:

On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House (NJ) - District 4

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

80%
2015-2016
83%
2013-2014
42%
2011-2012
16%
2007-2008
41%
2005-2006
50%
2003-2004
100%
2003-2004
100%
2003-2004
100%
2003
100%
1999-2000
100%
1999-2000
100
2007
67%
2005
82%
2003-2004
100%
2001-2002
0%
2004
67%
2019-2020
67%
2019-2020
39%
2017-2018
39%
2017-2018
13%
2015-2016
13%
2015-2016
21%
2013-2014
21%
2013-2014
33%
2011-2012
33%
2011-2012
100
2007
100
2007
92
2006
92
2006
92
2005
92
2005
33%
2015-2016
33%
2015-2016
20%
2015
20%
2014
16%
2013
33%
2011-2012
33%
2011-2012
54%
2011
80%
2009
100%
2008
67%
2020
65%
2018
67%
2017
53%
2015-2016
53%
2015-2016
54%
2015
61%
2014
61%
2013-2014
61%
2013-2014
69%
2013
64%
2011-2012
64%
2011-2012
29%
2006-2012
29%
2006-2012
17%
2023
11%
2022
60%
2022
61%
2021
43%
2021
81%
2020
62%
2020
76%
2019-2020
61%
2019
72%
2019
60%
2018
61%
2018
54%
2017-2018
61%
2017
49%
2017
62%
2016
45%
2016
34%
2015-2016
65%
2014
29%
2013-2014
68%
2013
29%
2013
40%
2012
70%
2012
50%
2011-2012
72%
2011
60%
2011
73%
2010
50%
2010
67%
2009-2010
79%
2009
82%
2007-2008
85%
2007
92%
2006
78%
2005
84%
2003-2004
85%
2003
73%
2001-2002
80%
1999-2000
75%
1999
83%
1998
81%
1997
62%
1995-1996
100%
2017-2018
31%
2005-2006
31%
2005-2006
83%
2011
83%
2011
88%
2003
88%
2003
arrow_upward