Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Frank LoBiondo's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: National Security

Office: U.S. House (NJ) - District 2, Republican

National Security

2015-2016 Center for Security Policy - Positions 89%
2015-2016 National Association of Police Organizations - Positions 80%
2015 Council for a Livable World - Positions 8%
2015 National Association of Police Organizations - Positions 83%
2015 National Iranian American Council - Positions 0%
2013-2014 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Center for Security Policy - Positions 93%
2013-2014 Council for a Livable World - Positions (House) 20%
2013-2014 National Association of Police Organizations - Positions 85%
2013 Peace Action West - Positions 13%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 90%
2011-2012 Center for Security Policy - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Council for a Livable World - Positions (House) 0%
2011 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 80%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Center for Security Policy - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 80%
2007-2008 Center for Security Policy - Positions 88%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 12%
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 21%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 94%
2005-2006 Center for Security Policy - Positions 93%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Council for a Livable World - Positions 27%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 75%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 96%
2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
1999-2000 Council for a Livable World - Positions 14%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 88%
1997 Center for Security Policy - Positions 80%
1996 Center for Security Policy - Positions 64%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top