Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Jon Tester's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Agriculture and Food

Office: U.S. Senate (MT) - Sr, Democratic
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. Senate - Sr
Timothy Adams
(Running)
Green Party
Rick Breckenridge
(Running)
Libertarian
Troy Downing
(Running)
Republican
Russ Fagg
(Running)
Republican
Steve Kelly
(Running)
Green Party
Al Olszewski
(Running)
Republican
Matt Rosendale
(Running)
Republican

Agriculture and Food

2017-2018 American Bakers Association - Positions 0%
2017-2018 American Farm Bureau Federation - "Congressional Scorecard & Voting Record" 25%
2017 Food Policy Action - Positions 100%
2016 National Farmers Union - "Congressional Scorecard" 33%
2015-2016 American Bakers Association - Positions 0%
2015-2016 Food Policy Action - Positions 92%
2015 Food Policy Action - Positions 100%
2014 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 50%
2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 89%
2013-2014 American Bakers Association - Positions 25%
2013-2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 89%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 83%
2012 National Farmers Union - Positions 80%
2011-2012 American Bakers Association - Positions 33%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 78%
2011 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 40%
2009-2010 American Bakers Association - Positions 0%
2009-2010 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 50%
2009-2010 National Farmers Union - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions 64%
2007-2008 Grassroots Netroots Alliance - Positions 80%
2007-2008 National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score 100
2007 National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions 79%
2007 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 5%
2005 Montana Stockgrowers Association - Positions 50%
2003 Montana Stockgrowers Association - Positions on Livestock Issues B
2003 Montana Wool Growers Association - Positions on Wool Growers Issues B
2001 Montana Stockgrowers Association - Positions 80%
1999 Montana Stockgrowers Association - Positions 88%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.00 but know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a charge of $0.00 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top