Please help us! Donate
James Riesberg's Ratings and Endorsements
2010 Endorsements
Filter by Issue:
- down
- Abortion
- Abortion and Reproductive
- Agriculture and Food
- Animals and Wildlife
- Arts, Entertainment, and History
- Business and Consumers
- Campaign Finance and Elections
- Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
- Crime
- Death Penalty
- Defense
- Drugs
- Education
- Employment and Affirmative Action
- Energy
- Environment
- Executive Branch
- Federal, State and Local Relations
- Foreign Affairs
- Gambling and Gaming
- Government Operations
- Guns
- Health and Health Care
- Housing and Property
- Immigration
- Indigenous Peoples
- Judicial Branch
- Labor Unions
- Legislative Branch
- Marriage, Family, and Children
- Military Personnel
- National Security
- Science
- Senior Citizens
- Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
- Stem Cell Research
- Technology and Communication
- Trade
- Transportation
- Unemployed and Low-Income
- Veterans
- Women
Abortion
2008 | NARAL Pro-Choice Colorado - Positions on Reproductive Rights | 100 |
2007 | NARAL Pro-Choice Colorado - Positions on Reproductive Rights | 100 |
Abortion and Reproductive
2008 | NARAL Pro-Choice Colorado - Positions on Reproductive Rights | 100 |
2007 | NARAL Pro-Choice Colorado - Positions on Reproductive Rights | 100 |
Animals and Wildlife
Business and Consumers
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
2011 | Women's Lobby of Colorado - Positions | 82 |
2010 | Women's Lobby of Colorado - Positions | 77% |
2009 | ACLU of Colorado - Positions on Workplace Rights | 75% |
2009 | Women's Lobby of Colorado - Positions | 89% |
2008 | ACLU of Colorado - Positions | 82% |
2008 | Equal Rights Colorado - Positions | 100% |
2007 | ACLU of Colorado - Positions on Civil Rights Issues | 85 |
2007 | Equal Rights Colorado - LGBT Issues Score | 100 |
2006 | ACLU of Colorado - Positions on Civil Rights Issues | 50 |
2006 | Equal Rights Colorado - Positions | 83% |
2005 | ACLU of Colorado - Positions | 85% |
2005 | Colorado Public Interest Research Group - Positions | 100% |
2005 | Equal Rights Colorado - Positions | 80% |
Environment
Government Budget and Spending
Guns
Labor Unions
2011 | Colorado AFL-CIO - Positions | 88% |
2011 | Colorado AFL-CIO - Lifetime | 87% |
2006 | Colorado AFL-CIO - Positions | 88% |
2005 | Colorado AFL-CIO - Positions | 77% |
Senior Citizens
2007 | AARP of Colorado - Positions | 60% |
2007 | Colorado Senior Lobby - Positions on Senior & Retirement Issues | 100 |
2006 | AARP of Colorado - Positions | 100% |
2006 | Colorado Senior Lobby - Positions | 86% |
2005 | AARP of Colorado - Positions | 100% |
Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
2008 | Equal Rights Colorado - Positions | 100% |
2007 | Equal Rights Colorado - LGBT Issues Score | 100 |
2006 | Equal Rights Colorado - Positions | 83% |
2005 | Equal Rights Colorado - Positions | 80% |
Taxes
Women
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.