or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Marcia L. Fudge

Marcia L. Fudge's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Government Operations

Full Name: Marcia L. Fudge
Current Office: U.S. House - District 11, Democratic
First Elected: 11/04/2008
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 11
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary May 6, 2014

Government Operations

2013 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2013 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 100%
2013 Bread for the World - Positions 80%
2013 FreedomWorks - Positions 35%
2013 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 89%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions (lifetime) 11%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions 20%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 100%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 16%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 13%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 13%
2012 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 94%
2012 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2011 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2011 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 5%
2011 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 5%
2011 FreedomWorks - Positions 5%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 15%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 15%
2011 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 89%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 19%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 2%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 2%
2010 FreedomWorks - Positions 11%
2010 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 88%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 3%
2009-2010 American Immigration Lawyers Association - U.S. House Score 100%
2009-2010 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 96%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 100%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 0%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 0%
2009 FreedomWorks - Positions 0%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 1%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 1%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 15%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 0%
2009 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 100
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 0%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 0%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 0%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top