| Full Name: | Marcia L. Fudge |
|---|---|
| Current Office: | U.S. House - District 11, Democratic |
| First Elected: | 11/04/2008 |
| Last Elected: | 11/06/2012 |
| Next Election: | 2014 |
| On The Ballot: | Announced, Republican for U.S. House - District 11 |
| Primary | May 6, 2014 |
Marcia L. Fudge
Marcia L. Fudge's Ratings and Endorsements
Filter by Issue:
- down
- Abortion
- Abortion and Reproductive
- Agriculture and Food
- Animals and Wildlife
- Arts, Entertainment, and History
- Budget, Spending and Taxes
- Business and Consumers
- Campaign Finance and Elections
- Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
- Conservative
- Crime
- Death Penalty
- Defense
- Drugs
- Education
- Employment and Affirmative Action
- Energy
- Environment
- Executive Branch
- Federal, State and Local Relations
- Foreign Affairs
- Gambling and Gaming
- Government Operations
- Guns
- Health and Health Care
- Housing and Property
- Immigration
- Indigenous Peoples
- Judicial Branch
- Labor Unions
- Legislative Branch
- Liberal
- Marriage, Family, and Children
- Military Personnel
- National Security
- Science
- Senior Citizens
- Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
- Social
- Stem Cell Research
- Technology and Communication
- Trade
- Transportation
- Unemployed and Low-Income
- Veterans
- Women
Abortion
| 2013 | National Right to Life Committee - Positions (Jan. 14, 2014) | 0% |
| 2012 | NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions | 100% |
| 2011-2012 | Campaign for Working Families - Positions | 0% |
| 2011-2012 | National Right to Life Committee - Positions | 0% |
| 2011 | NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions | 100% |
| 2011 | National Right to Life Committee - Positions | 0% |
| 2010 | NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | Campaign for Working Families - Positions | 0% |
| 2009-2010 | National Right to Life Committee - Positions | 16% |
| 2009 | Campaign for Working Families - Positions | 0% |
| 2009 | NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions | 100% |
| 2009 | National Right to Life Committee - Positions | 0% |
Abortion and Reproductive
Agriculture and Food
| 2013 | Food Policy Action - Positions | 92% |
| 2013 | Food Policy Action - Positions | 92% |
| 2013 | International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2011-2012 | Food Policy Action - Positions | 69% |
| 2011-2012 | Food Policy Action - Positions | 69% |
| 2011-2012 | International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions (House) | 0% |
| 2011-2012 | United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions | 100% |
| 2011 | American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 31% |
| 2009-2010 | American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 40% |
| 2009-2010 | International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2009-2010 | National Farmers Union - Positions | 100% |
Animals and Wildlife
Arts, Entertainment, and History
Budget, Spending and Taxes
Business and Consumers
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
Conservative
Defense
Drugs
| 2009 | AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) Advocacy Association - Positions on AIDS Drug Assistance | 40% |
Education
Employment and Affirmative Action
| 2013 | Competitive Enterprise Institute - Workplace Choice (August, 2013) | 0% |
| 2013 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 90% |
| 2012 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 90% |
| 2011 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 100% |
| 2010 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 50% |
| 2009-2010 | National Association for the Self-Employed - U.S. House Score | 100% |
| 2009 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 90% |
| 2009 | Women Employed - Positions | 50% |
Environment
Foreign Affairs
Government Operations
Guns
Health and Health Care
Housing and Property
| 2008-2011 | Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby | 0% |
Immigration
Labor Unions
Liberal
Marriage, Family, and Children
| 2014 | Population Connection - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) | 100% |
| 2013 | Eagle Forum - Positions | 0% |
| 2012 | Eagle Forum - Positions | 0% |
| 2011-2012 | Campaign for Working Families - Positions | 0% |
| 2011 | Children's Defense Fund - Positions | 100% |
| 2011 | Christian Coalition of America - Positions | 0% |
| 2011 | Eagle Forum - Positions | 23% |
| 2011 | Family Research Council - Positions | 10% |
| 2011 | The Children's Health Fund - Positions (House Only) | 100% |
| 2010 | Eagle Forum - Positions | 11% |
| 2010 | Vote Kids - Positions | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | American Family Association - Positions | 5% |
| 2009-2010 | Campaign for Working Families - Positions | 0% |
| 2009-2010 | Children's Defense Fund - Positions | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | Christian Coalition of America - Positions | 10% |
| 2009-2010 | Family Research Council - Positions | 6% |
| 2009 | Campaign for Working Families - Positions | 0% |
| 2009 | Eagle Forum - Positions | 0% |
| 2009 | Population Connection - Committee Votes Score | 100% |
| 2009 | The Children's Health Fund - Positions | 66% |
| 2009 | Vote Kids - Positions | 100% |
Military Personnel
National Security
| 2013 | Peace Action West - Positions (Nov. 20, 2013) | 83% |
| 2012 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 22% |
| 2011-2012 | ACT! for America - Positions | 42% |
| 2011-2012 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 5% |
| 2011-2012 | PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) | 100% |
| 2010 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 20% |
| 2009-2010 | ACT! for America - Positions | 40% |
| 2009-2010 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 0% |
| 2009-2010 | Council for a Livable World - Positions | 66% |
| 2009-2010 | PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) | 66% |
| 2009 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 50% |
| 2001-2010 | Keep America Safe - Positions | 8% |
Senior Citizens
Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
| 2011-2012 | Human Rights Campaign - Positions | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | Human Rights Campaign - Positions | 97% |
Social
Technology and Communication
Transportation
Unemployed and Low-Income
Veterans
Women
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
