Please help us! Donate
Ginny Burdick's Ratings and Endorsements
Filter by Issue:
- down
- Abortion
- Abortion and Reproductive
- Agriculture and Food
- Animals and Wildlife
- Arts, Entertainment, and History
- Business and Consumers
- Campaign Finance and Elections
- Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
- Crime
- Death Penalty
- Defense
- Drugs
- Education
- Employment and Affirmative Action
- Energy
- Environment
- Executive Branch
- Federal, State and Local Relations
- Foreign Affairs
- Gambling and Gaming
- Government Operations
- Guns
- Health and Health Care
- Housing and Property
- Immigration
- Indigenous Peoples
- Judicial Branch
- Labor Unions
- Legislative Branch
- Marriage, Family, and Children
- Military Personnel
- National Security
- Science
- Senior Citizens
- Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
- Stem Cell Research
- Technology and Communication
- Trade
- Transportation
- Unemployed and Low-Income
- Veterans
- Women
Abortion
2005 | NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon - Positions on Reproductive Rights | 100% |
2003 | Planned Parenthood Advocates of Oregon - Positions | 100% |
1999 | NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon - Positions | 100% |
Agriculture and Food
2016 | Oregon Farm Bureau - Positions | 44% |
2014 | Oregon Farm Bureau - Positions | 57% |
2013 | Oregon Farm Bureau - Positions | 67% |
2011 | Oregon Farm Bureau - Positions | 89% |
2007 | Oregon Farm Bureau - Positions on Agriculture | 77 |
2005 | Oregon Farm Bureau - Positions | 56% |
2003 | Oregon Farm Bureau - Positions on Agriculture | F |
Animals and Wildlife
2011 | Oregon Humane Society - Positions | 100% |
2006 | Humane USA- Oregon - Positions on Animal Protection | 100 |
Business and Consumers
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
Conservative
Education
Employment and Affirmative Action
2013 | Racial Equity Report Working Group - Positions | 100% |
2011 | Racial Equity Report Working Group - Positions | 94% |
Environment
Fiscally Conservative
Government Budget and Spending
2003 | Taxpayer Association of Oregon - Positions | 0% |
2002 | Taxpayer Association of Oregon - Positions on Tax and Fiscal Policy | 25% |
Guns
Higher Education
K-12 Education
Labor Unions
Marriage, Family, and Children
2000 | Dads Against Discrimination (Fathers Online) - Positions on Father's Rights | 0% |
Minors and Children
2015-2016 | Oregon Stand for Children - Positions | 100% |
2013 | Oregon Stand for Children - Positions | 100% |
2011 | Oregon Stand for Children - Positions | 92% |
2009 | Oregon Stand for Children - Positions | 100% |
2007 | Oregon Stand for Children - Positions on Education Funding and Policy | 100% |
2005 | Oregon Stand for Children - Positions | 100% |
Socially Conservative
Taxes
2003 | Taxpayer Association of Oregon - Positions | 0% |
2002 | Taxpayer Association of Oregon - Positions on Tax and Fiscal Policy | 25% |
Women
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.