Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Key Votes

HB 372 - Amends Definition of Residency for Voting Purposes - New Hampshire Key Vote

Andy Sanborn voted Yea (Ought to Pass as Amended Vote) on this Legislation.

Read statements Andy Sanborn made in this general time period.

Timeline

Issues Related to HB 372

Stage Details

Legislation - "Ought to Pass as Amended" Report Adopted (Senate) (14-9) - (Key vote)
See How Your Politicians Voted

Title: Amends Definition of Residency for Voting Purposes

Vote Result
Yea Votes
Nay Votes
Vote Smart's Synopsis:

Vote to pass a bill that amends the definition of residency with regard to eligibility to vote or hold office within the state.

Highlights:

 

  • Requires, for purposes of voting and holding office in New Hampshire, a resident or inhabitant to be an individual who is domiciled in New Hampshire and has demonstrated a current intent to designate that domicile as their principal place of presence (Sec. 2).

  • Specifies that residency status will not be revoked by a temporary absence from an individual’s principal place of presence in the state so long as they intend to return to it (Sec. 2).

Legislation - "Ought to Pass" Report Adopted (House) (188-163) -

Title: Amends Definition of Residency for Voting Purposes

Legislation - Introduced (House) -

Title: Amends Definition of Residency for Voting Purposes

Sponsors

  • David Bates (NH - R) (Out Of Office)
Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Thank You!

You are about to be redirected to a secure checkout page.

Please note:

The total order amount will read $0.01. This is a card processor fee. Please know that a recurring donation of the amount and frequency that you selected will be processed and initiated tomorrow. You may see a one-time charge of $0.01 on your statement.

Continue to secure page »

Back to top