Please help us! Donate
Key Votes
ABx8 9 - Tax and Transportation Law Amendments - Key Vote
California Key Votes
Abel Maldonado voted Yea (Passage With Amendment) on this Legislation.
Read statements Abel Maldonado made in this general time period.
Stages
- March 22, 2010 Executive Signed
- March 4, 2010 House Concurrence Vote Passed
- March 4, 2010 Senate Bill Passed
- Feb. 4, 2010 Passage
- Jan. 15, 2010 Introduced
Family
Issues
Stage Details
Legislation - Signed (Executive) - March 22, 2010
Title: Tax and Transportation Law Amendments
Legislation - Concurrence Vote Passed (House) (43-30) - March 4, 2010(Key vote)
Title: Tax and Transportation Law Amendments
Vote Result
Yea Votes
Nay Votes
Vote to concur with Senate amendments and pass a bill that appropriates money to the Transportation Debt Service Fund for the payment of bond debts.
- -The Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Act of 1990;
-The Passenger Rail and Clean Air Bond Act of 1996;
-The Seismic Retrofit Bond Act of 1996;
-The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006; and
-The Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for 21st Century.
- -$144 million for the Seismic Retrofit Bond Act of 1996;
-$124 million for the Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Act of 1990; and
-$71 million for the Passenger Rail and Clean Air Bond Act of 1996.
- -25 percent for the following purposes:
- -To the Department of Transportation for bus and passenger rail services (§14035, 14035.5, and 14038);
-To the Department of Transportation for funding of public transit capital improvement projects in the state transportation improvement program
-To the Department of Transportation for its planning activities not payable from the State Highway Account in the State Transportation Fund, it's mass transportation responsibilities, and its assistance in regional transportation planning;
-To the Department of Transportation for allocation by the director to the Institute of Transportation Studies of the University of California for training and research in public transportation systems engineering and management and coordination with other transportation modes;-To the Highway Commission for its activities not payable from the State Highway Account;
-To the Public Utilities Commission for its passenger rail safety responsibilities specified in statute on commuter rail, intercity rail, and urban rail transit lines; and
-For transfer to the Transportation Debt Service Fund for current year debt service payments on bonds as follows:
- -For the 2009 fiscal year, up to $142 million; and
-For the 2010--11 fiscal year, up to $254 million, as an amount equal to monthly debt service paid by the General Fund on any bonds issued pursuant to Proposition 108 (1990) and Proposition 1A (2008), and one-quarter of the monthly debt service paid by the General Fund on any bonds issued pursuant to Proposition 1B (2006);
- -50 percent to transportation planning agencies, county transportation commissions, and the San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board (§99314); and
-50 percent to transportation planning agencies, county transportation commissions, and the San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board (§99313).
- -44 percent to the State Highway Account to fund projects in the State Transportation Improvement
Program, except in the 2010--11 fiscal year, 50 percent shall be transferred;
-12 percent to the State Highway Account to fund projects in the State Highway Operation and Protection Program, except in the 2010-11 fiscal year, no revenues shall be transferred; and
-44 percent apportioned by the Controller for local street and road purposes, except in the 2010-11 fiscal year, 50 percent shall be transferred for the following purposes:
- -50 percent apportioned by the Controller to cities, including a city and county, in the proportion that the total population of the city bears to the total population of all the cities in the state; and
-50 percent apportioned by the Controller to counties, including a city and county, according to the following formulas:
- -75 percent apportioned among the counties in the proportion that the number of fee-paid and exempt vehicles that are registered in the county bear to the number of fee-paid and exempt vehicles registered in the state; and
-25 percent apportioned among the counties in the proportion that the number of miles of maintained county roads in each county bear to the total number of miles of maintained county roads in the state. For the purposes of apportioning funds, any roads within the boundaries of a city and county that are not state highways shall be deemed to be county roads.
Legislation - Bill Passed With Amendment (Senate) (21-10) - March 4, 2010(Key vote)
Title: Tax and Transportation Law Amendments
Vote Result
Yea Votes
Nay Votes
Vote to pass a bill that appropriates money to the Transportation Debt Service Fund for the payment of bond debts.
- -The Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Act of 1990;
-The Passenger Rail and Clean Air Bond Act of 1996;
-The Seismic Retrofit Bond Act of 1996;
-The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006; and
-The Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for 21st Century.
- -$144 million for the Seismic Retrofit Bond Act of 1996;
-$124 million for the Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Act of 1990; and
-$71 million for the Passenger Rail and Clean Air Bond Act of 1996.
- -25 percent for the following purposes:
- -To the Department of Transportation for bus and passenger rail services (§14035, 14035.5, and 14038);
-To the Department of Transportation for funding of public transit capital improvement projects in the state transportation improvement program
-To the Department of Transportation for its planning activities not payable from the State Highway Account in the State Transportation Fund, it's mass transportation responsibilities, and its assistance in regional transportation planning;
-To the Department of Transportation for allocation by the director to the Institute of Transportation Studies of the University of California for training and research in public transportation systems engineering and management and coordination with other transportation modes;-To the Highway Commission for its activities not payable from the State Highway Account;
-To the Public Utilities Commission for its passenger rail safety responsibilities specified in statute on commuter rail, intercity rail, and urban rail transit lines; and
-For transfer to the Transportation Debt Service Fund for current year debt service payments on bonds as follows:
- -For the 2009 fiscal year, up to $142 million; and
-For the 2010--11 fiscal year, up to $254 million, as an amount equal to monthly debt service paid by the General Fund on any bonds issued pursuant to Proposition 108 (1990) and Proposition 1A (2008), and one-quarter of the monthly debt service paid by the General Fund on any bonds issued pursuant to Proposition 1B (2006);
- -50 percent to transportation planning agencies, county transportation commissions, and the San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board (§99314); and
-50 percent to transportation planning agencies, county transportation commissions, and the San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board (§99313).
- -44 percent to the State Highway Account to fund projects in the State Transportation Improvement
Program, except in the 2010--11 fiscal year, 50 percent shall be transferred;
-12 percent to the State Highway Account to fund projects in the State Highway Operation and Protection Program, except in the 2010-11 fiscal year, no revenues shall be transferred; and
-44 percent apportioned by the Controller for local street and road purposes, except in the 2010-11 fiscal year, 50 percent shall be transferred for the following purposes:
- -50 percent apportioned by the Controller to cities, including a city and county, in the proportion that the total population of the city bears to the total population of all the cities in the state; and
-50 percent apportioned by the Controller to counties, including a city and county, according to the following formulas:
- -75 percent apportioned among the counties in the proportion that the number of fee-paid and exempt vehicles that are registered in the county bear to the number of fee-paid and exempt vehicles registered in the state; and
-25 percent apportioned among the counties in the proportion that the number of miles of maintained county roads in each county bear to the total number of miles of maintained county roads in the state. For the purposes of apportioning funds, any roads within the boundaries of a city and county that are not state highways shall be deemed to be county roads.
Legislation - Passage (House) (-) - Feb. 4, 2010
Legislation - Introduced (House) - Jan. 15, 2010
Title: Tax and Transportation Law Amendments
Committee Sponsors
- Budget (Sponsor)