American Foreign Policy

Floor Speech

Date: March 10, 2015
Location: Washington, DC

BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT

Mr. NELSON. Mr. President, when 47 Republican Senators signed a
letter sent to the Ayatollah Khomeini, it was a letter that although
supposedly instructive of the constitutional provisions of the
separation of government in the United States, in effect, it was a
letter to erode the negotiating position of the President of the United
States and his administration in trying to reach an agreement to not
have a nuclear weapon capability of building a bomb in Iran.

I think history will show the strength of American foreign policy has
always been bipartisanship when it comes to the interests of America as
we look out and have to defend ourselves against our enemies. Indeed,
Iran with a nuclear bomb would be one of the gravest threats to our
national security as well as to our allies. It saddens me that we have
come to the point where we are so divided that nearly half of the
Senators, on a partisan basis, in this great institution of the U.S.
Senate, would in effect try to cut the legs from underneath the
President and his administration in trying to reach an agreement to
avert a nuclear bomb.

So much has been said about this issue, but one common theme runs
throughout, and it is that people seem to know what the agreement is as
it is being negotiated in secret. This Senator will reserve judgment.
This Senator is also an original cosponsor of the bill we filed to have
Congress weigh in on any future lifting of economic sanctions that have
been imposed by the Congress, and this Senator feels that is an
appropriate role, under the separation of powers, of our job as
Congress. But when we see a major part, on a partisan basis, of our
government try to undercut and kill the negotiations while they are
going on at this very moment in Geneva, then that goes a step too far.

I am saddened. I think about what this Senator would have done when
the President was not Barack Obama but George Bush. I cannot imagine
that I would have tried to undercut the President of the United States
representing this country and trying, on matters of war and peace, to
keep peace. We can disagree about the specifics, but we still have to
honor the institution of the Presidency, and when it becomes matters of
war and peace, then we have to unify. That is why I am so saddened that
we have come to the point at which we appear to be so divided.

Mr. President, I yield the floor.

BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT


Source
arrow_upward