Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Public Statements

Reps. Kind, Ros-Lehtinen, Schwartz and Esty Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Provide Social Security Benefits for All Legally Married Couples

Press Release

By:
Date:
Location: Washington, DC

U.S. Reps. Ron Kind (D-WI), Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), Allyson Y. Schwartz (D-PA) and Elizabeth H. Esty (D-CT) introduced the Social Security and Marriage Equality (SAME) Act, which would amend the Social Security Act to ensure that all same-sex spouses receive equal treatment when applying for Social Security benefits regardless of which state they live in.

"The lifetime commitment to love and care for one another embodied in the bond of marriage doesn't change from state to state. No matter where a legally married couple chooses to live, every individual should have the comfort of knowing that their union will be treated equally under the law," said Rep. Ron Kind. "The peace of mind and economic security provided by Social Security spousal benefits should be enjoyed by every married couple who pays into the system. This is an issue of fundamental fairness, and I'm proud to help lead this bipartisan effort toward greater equality for every American citizen."

"Couples, regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation, should not be denied the federal benefits they deserve just because their state of domicile does not recognize their marriage," said Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen. "The quest for truly equal rights has been the cornerstone of our nation since its founding and we must continue that proud tradition by ensuring that same-sex couples are not disenfranchised by a circumstance of residence."

Rep. Allyson Y. Schwartz said, "All legally married couples deserve equal treatment under our nation's laws, regardless of their sexual orientation, where they live or where they took their vows. It is inexcusable that the federal government continues to withhold Social Security benefits that legally married same-sex couples have earned. I will keep fighting to ensure all loving, committed same-sex couples receive the same federal benefits and protections that apply to other married couples and their families."

Rep. Elizabeth H. Esty said, "Marriage equality is personal for many American families, including my own. A few years ago, I was thrilled when my brother married his long-time partner--something they had previously been denied the right to do. While we've taken steps toward a more inclusive, more equal future, there is still work to do. That's why I'm proud to join my colleagues in introducing the SAME Act to ensure that all couples -- regardless of their sexual orientation and regardless of the state in which they live - receive the Social Security benefits they"ve earned after lifetimes of hard work."

"Every legally married, same-sex couple deserves to have their marriage fully recognized by the federal government regardless of where they live or what federal benefits they have earned,"said David Stacy, Government Affairs Director, Human Rights Campaign. "We are grateful to Reps. Ron Kind, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Allyson Schwartz and Elizabeth Esty for bringing attention to the essential protections provided by Social Security. Their strong, passionate and consistent leadership is moving us closer to an America where every citizen is treated equally regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity."

"The SAME Act will provide access to thousands of married same-sex couples in states like Wisconsin where marriage equality is not yet reality," stated Katie Belanger, President & CEO of Fair Wisconsin, the statewide LGBT education and advocacy organization. "I commend the bold leadership demonstrated by our own Congressman Kind, as well as the bipartisan group of Congressional leaders who have introduced this critical bill."

In the Supreme Court case United States v. Windsor of 2013, the Court overturned Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act and found that the federal government may not create two classes of marriage. But the Windsor decision offered minimal guidance as to the status of legally married couples who live in states that do not recognize same-sex marriages. That lack of guidance is having a major economic and emotional impact on those who lose a spouse in a same-sex marriage.

The Social Security Act determines eligibility for spousal benefits by place of residence. As a result, holds are being placed on applications for Social Security benefits for legally married same-sex spouses who live in states that do not recognize their marriages.

The SAME Act (H.R. 4664) would serve as a roadmap for the Social Security Administration (SSA) to follow, to ensure that all legal marriages are recognized equally. The bill would override current SSA policy that requires a spouse to reside in a state that recognizes same-sex marriage in order to be eligible for Social Security spousal benefits, and would provide full spousal benefits to all citizens who were legally married in the United States or in another country.

Senators Patty Murray (D-WA), Mark Udall (D-CO) and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) are leading companion legislation in the U.S. Senate.


Source:
Skip to top
Back to top