or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Public Statements

Corker: With Consensus Building for Pro-Growth Tax Reform, Buffett Tax would be "Counterproductive"

Press Release

Location: Washington, DC


With consensus building in both parties toward pro-growth tax reform that would eliminate loopholes and lower rates for all Americans, U.S. Senator Bob Corker, R-Tenn., today opposed the so-called Buffett Tax, saying it is "counterproductive."

"There's tremendous bipartisan consensus building toward pro-growth tax reform that eliminates loopholes so we can lower everyone's rates, simplifies the tax code and broadens the base, and the Buffett Tax would move us in the opposite direction and be highly counterproductive. What we need to move the economy into high gear is pro-growth tax reform accompanied by a plan to restore the solvency of Social Security and Medicare and reduce long-term deficits," Corker said.

In March 2011, Senator Corker was among 64 senators -- 32 Republicans and 32 Democrats -- who sent a letter to President Obama pledging support for the kind of deficit reduction plan set forth by the Simpson-Bowles commission, which included comprehensive tax reform. Six months later, after the Budget Control Act was passed, Corker again joined 45 Democratic and Republican senators in calling for the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction (commonly known as the "supercommittee") to "go big," cutting the deficit by $4 trillion over a decade and implementing pro-growth tax reform.

The Joint Committee on Taxation estimated the Buffett Tax would raise $47 billion over the next ten years. The approximately $5 billion in additional revenue each year would cover less than two days of projected 2012 deficit spending.

Back to top