Search Form
Now choose a category »

Public Statements

Letter to Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Letter

By:
Date:
Location: Washington, DC

Today, Congressman John Sullivan, along with 153 of his colleagues, sent a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, asking her to suspend the final rule for mandatory contraceptive, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drug coverage in the health insurance market. In response to Secretary Sebelius' recent announcement that, beginning in 2013, any organization that offers health insurance to its employees will be forced to cover contraceptive services, Congressmen Sullivan offered the following statement:

"This regulation is a clear violation of longstanding laws that protect conscience rights of healthcare providers and is the Obama Administration's latest attack on the freedom of religion that is guaranteed by the First Amendment of our Constitution. I am calling on the Administration to reverse this controversial rule to ensure that any organization or individual that opposes abortion and the mandatory coverage of drugs, such as Plan B and Ella, is not forced to abandon their religious beliefs to comply with a law. Every group that values religious liberty should be outraged by this rule, and every American should be worried about the Obama Administration's blatant disregard for religious freedom."

January 27, 2012

Secretary Kathleen Sebelius

United States Department of Health and Human Services

200 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20201

Dear Secretary Sebelius:

As pro-life Members of Congress, we are writing to voice our strong opposition to your final decision on the rule for mandatory contraceptive, sterilization, and abortifacients coverage in the individual and group health insurance market. This mandate will force religious-affiliated organizations that offer health insurance to cover contraceptives, sterilizations, and abortifacients, even if it is a clear violation of their conscience rights.

During the public comment period, HHS received over 200,000 comments on the rule with many citing that the narrow scope of the religious exemption issued on August 1, 2011, would only apply to places of worship. Countless other religious-affiliated organizations, such as schools, hospitals and even religious charities, are not protected under this exemption. Furthermore, although the new decision grants religious-affiliated organizations a one-year extension in order to comply with the mandate, this extension only delays the inevitable violation of conscience. In reference to the extension, Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, stated, "In effect, the President is saying we have a year to figure out how to violate our consciences."

HHS's latest decision to mandate contraceptive, sterilization, and abortifacients coverage is an unprecedented overreach by the federal government that infringes upon rights guaranteed by the First Amendment. This decision also will violate the conscience rights of those who, for moral or religious reasons, oppose abortion. The reason is, as you know, the rule mandates coverage for FDA approved drugs and devices that can function as abortifacients, including certain IUDs and drugs such as Plan B and Ella.

As pro-life Members of Congress, we urge you to reconsider the final rule as it applies to any employer or individual that opposes coverage of such services based on moral or religious reasons. In your response to this letter, we request that you provide us specific details on the process followed in the reading and evaluating of the public comments submitted. Additionally, in light of the concerns mentioned, we respectfully request that you suspend the final rule until you can ensure that both employers and individuals are afforded their constitutionally protected conscience rights.


Source:
Skip to top
Back to top