or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Public Statements

Bipartisan Bill Reduces Red Tape on Job Creators

Statement

By:
Date:
Location: Washington, DC

A bipartisan, bicameral group in Congress today unveiled a plan to significantly reform the federal regulatory process and reduce unnecessary burdens on job creators. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas), Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law Subcommittee Chairman Howard Coble (R-N.C.) and Representative Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) were joined by Senators Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) in introducing the Regulatory Accountability Act of 2011. The bill reforms the current rulemaking process to lower the costs and improve the quality of new regulations.

This bipartisan, bicameral effort is the first of its kind in more than a decade to reform and minimize regulations that stifle economic growth.

Chairman Smith: "The current regulatory system has become a barrier to economic growth and job creation. Federal regulations cost our economy $1.75 trillion each year. Employers are rightly concerned about the costs these regulations will impose on their businesses. So they stop hiring, stop spending and start saving for a bill from Big Brother. But rather than burdening businesses with more regulations, we need to free up employers so they can create jobs for American workers. The Regulatory Accountability Act does just that. It places permanent restrictions on regulatory agencies and restores accountability by requiring openness and transparency in the regulatory process. This is a bipartisan, bicameral bill that both parties, both houses of Congress and the President should support."

Representative Peterson: "While it is difficult to enact a new law, it's even harder to get a regulation written correctly. In many cases, interest groups try to use regulation to interpret the law in their best interest, instead of following the intent of the law. By bringing transparency and accountability to the regulatory process, the American people will be allowed to have a voice in these policy decisions."

Representative Coble: "This bill will help ensure that future regulations are based on the best available scientific information and that they are efficient. Many of the regulations being issued are founded on questionable basis and they disregard less costly alternatives. This legislation does not affect the what-is, it addresses the what-will-be and should be embraced by everyone."

Senator Portman: "One of the most frequent concerns I hear from employers throughout Ohio is that mounting regulatory burdens impede growth and increase the costs of doing business. This common-sense, bipartisan legislation will cut back on unnecessary red tape by building economic reality-checks into every step of the regulatory process. It's an immediate step Washington can take to help unleash the forces of job creation again in America."

Senator Pryor: "We need a 21st Century regulatory system that promotes growth, innovation and job creation. By ensuring all parties have a seat at the table at the beginning of the process, this legislation prevents overly burdensome and drawn-out regulations from interfering with our nation's prosperity."

For decades, presidents of both parties have issued executive orders to produce more sensible, less burdensome regulations. This bill makes the principles of those bipartisan directives permanent, enforceable, and applicable to all regulatory agencies, including independent agencies. The Act also requires agencies to tailor new regulations to impose the least cost necessary to achieve policy goals set out by Congress. Finally, the bill requires agencies to hold formal hearings to test the assumptions and evidence on which the costliest new rules are based.


Source:
Back to top