U.S. Rep. Nan Hayworth, M.D. (NY-19) has written Department of Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood requesting revisions to the Minimum Retroreflectivity Levels provisions listed in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) released by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in 2009. These provisions amount to a significant and costly unfunded federal mandate for local governments all across the country.
Hayworth has asked LaHood to reconsider regulations in the MUTCD that would require the replacement of certain regulatory, warning, and post-mounted guide signs by 2018.
"This is a major issue for municipalities throughout our district and all across the country. These provisions are a burdensome unfunded mandate that will in many cases cost hundreds of thousands of dollars or more," Hayworth stated. "These requirements will force towns to replace perfectly good signs at the expense of other higher-priority projects. This may in turn cause increases in property taxes. During a time of strained state, county, and local budgets, and increased demand for social services, this is not an effective use of time, money, and resources."
In her letter Hayworth cited previous statements made by LaHood discounting the need for the new standard where the provision "makes no sense" and noting that the new standard "does not properly take into account the high costs that local governments would have to bear."
Ninety-one fellow members of the U.S. House of Representatives have signed on to Hayworth's letter. Text of the letter can be found below or in PDF format here.
Text of the letter:
June 9, 2011
The Honorable Ray LaHood
The Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE
Washington, DC 20590
Dear Secretary LaHood:
In December 2009, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) released the 2009 edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Several MUTCD provisions related to Minimum Retroreflectivity Levels (Section 2A.08) would create costly burdens for local governments.
Specifically, the replacement of certain regulatory, warning, and post-mounted guide (except street name) signs is required by January 22, 2015. Additionally, the replacement of certain street name signs and overhead guide signs is required by January 22, 2018.
During this time of economic uncertainty, we urge you to prevent unfunded mandates that would require local governments to incur additional unnecessary cost burdens. Many towns have already invested heavily in their existing signage. We have heard from numerous county and town officials that compliance with these mandates will force towns to raise taxes and discontinue more urgent projects which have already been initiated.
Some local officials estimate that signs meeting the new retroreflectivity levels mandated by the MUTCD can be twice as expensive, per square foot, as the current signs. During a time of strained state, county, and local budgets, and increased demand for social services, this is not an effective use of time, money, and resources.
While we support the goal of making our roads safer, unique street signs have long been a part of town heritage, and signage within towns has traditionally been within the purview of state and local authorities.
Mr. Secretary, even you have stated that this regulation "makes no sense" and that it "does not properly take into account the high costs that local governments would have to bear." We agree. In light of your comments, we strongly encourage you to reconsider these regulations as quickly and expeditiously as possible.
We look forward to your response to the concerns outlined above.
Nan Hayworth, M.D.
Member of Congress