Federal Analysis of Grand Canyon Uranium Mining Impacts Relied on Industry Consultant Personally Invested In Mining Claims

Press Release

Date: June 14, 2011
Location: Washington, DC

A Department of the Interior decision on the future of uranium mining near the Grand Canyon -- expected to be announced in the coming days -- was based in part on analysis by a mining industry consultant who would personally profit if the current moratorium on new uranium claims is lifted. A report by Earthworks and the Environmental Working Group explains how a February study released by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) relied heavily on a paper by the consultant and downplayed the risks of mining proposals near the Grand Canyon.

BLM in February published an overview and scientific analysis of the options for lifting the current moratorium on new uranium mining claims on 1 million acres surrounding the Canyon. The analysis relied heavily on a paper by the consultant, Karen Wenrich, of Golden, Colo. Three days before release of the BLM study, an Arizona uranium mining company completed a deal -- subsequently filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission -- disclosing a contract to pay Wenrich $225,000 for 61 mining claims if the moratorium is lifted. The BLM report offered almost no discussion of the risk that radioactive mine waste could contaminate the Colorado River, which flows through the Canyon.

Records show Wenrich staked her claims in the million-acre area around the Canyon in 2007 and 2008. These existing claims could be more easily developed if the moratorium is lifted.

"Public land shouldn't be given away cheaply, especially based on the analysis of anyone who stands to profit," said Rep. Raúl M. Grijalva, ranking member of the House Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands. "If mining deals near the Grand Canyon need this much help demonstrating they're good for the taxpayer, there's no reason they should be approved. This conflict of interest needs to be cleared up immediately and an unbiased analysis needs to be done to protect the public interest."


Source
arrow_upward