Congresswoman Louise Slaughter (NY-28) and U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) today announced that they have introduced legislation that would provide America's women in uniform with the same rights to reproductive choice as most other employees of the federal government.
Currently, the health coverage provided to servicewomen fails to cover abortion, even in the case of rape or incest, which is unlike most other women receiving health care from the federal government including Medicare recipients, federal employees not in the military and women receiving care through the Indian Health Services, all of whom can receive abortions in the case of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother.
Today, Slaughter and Gillibrand announced the MARCH for Military Women Act (Military Access to Reproductive Care and Health) which would lift the statutory ban that denies U.S. servicewomen coverage for abortion care in cases of rape or incest and prevents women in the military from using private funds to access abortion services at U.S. military facilities.
"As our servicewomen risk their lives defending our country, it is deeply unfair that they are denied the rights of the Constitution that they defend," said Congresswoman Slaughter. "Imagine being a victim of rape on a United States military base overseas being denied the abortion coverage, and then having to turn to a potentially unsafe local facility. It's preposterous and incredibly unjust to the women who serve our country so proudly each day."
"It is an outrage that the women in our military do not have the same basic protections for reproductive health care as women across the U.S." said Senator Gillibrand. "We must put an end to this egregious injustice and allow our women in uniform to exercise their right to reproductive health care."
Currently, servicewomen are not allowed to pay for abortion services with their own funds in military medical facilities, except in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the life of the mother. Privately funded abortion care was available to servicewomen until 1988, when the Department of Defense rescinded the right. Women serving overseas are perhaps most affected by this policy, as they may be forced to rely on unsafe local facilities. Failing that, a servicewoman would need to request permission from her supervisor to leave her combat mission and return to the United States or another country where abortion care is available.
More on the legislation and the coalition of support it has received is included below.
Department of Defense statistics show that 3,158 sexual assaults were reported in the military in fiscal year 2010. While shocking, that statistic only reflects a fraction of the sexual assaults, due to under-reporting in the military. Indeed, the Defense Task Force on Sexual Assault in the Military Services report estimated that as many as 90 percent of sexual assaults go unreported. After a woman is assaulted, she should not have to fight to receive medical services such as an abortion.
Every woman should have access to comprehensive health care coverage. At the very least, women in the military should not receive lesser care than other women with government insurance. And yet, today, that is true. Most other women with government insurance -- including Medicare recipients, federal employees (other than soldiers), and women receiving care through the Indian Health Services -- are provided with coverage for abortion in the case of rape or incest. Women in the military, however, are shown lesser regard.
The MARCH for Military Women Act (Military Access to Reproductive Care and Health), H.R. 2085, will
* Lift the statutory ban that denies U.S. servicewomen coverage for abortion care in cases of rape or incest
* Lift the statutory ban that prevents women in the military from using private funds to access abortion services at U.S. military facilities.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
In the House, H.R. 2085 has 40 cosponsors