Following a vote by the U.S. House of Representatives to privatize Medicare, U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH today joined a group of central Ohio seniors to stand against threats to privatize Medicare through a voucher system as proposed under the House Republican's Fiscal Year 2012 budget. Brown held a press conference with central Ohio seniors and members of the Ohio Alliance for retired Americans at the Clintonville Community Resources Center.
"Giving seniors a voucher of approximately $8,000, as proposed by the House Republican budget, is a reckless and irresponsible way to address the health care needs of Ohio's seniors," Brown said. "It is simply unacceptable to finance tax cuts for those who are earning ten times or more than the retirement income of the average Medicare recipient."
According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), in the first year of the voucher program, out-of-pocket expenses for seniors would double under the Republican plan to more than $12,500 annually. For seniors on a fixed income, a doubling of out-of-pocket expenses is simply unaffordable, particularly when the average Social Security benefit is only $14,000 per year.
Earlier this month, Brown led a group of 50 Senators in signing a letter to President Obama expressing their opposition to the plan.
The text of the letter can be found below:
May 5, 2011
The Honorable Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. President:
We are writing to commend you for your opposition to turning Medicare into a voucher system as proposed in the House Republican's FY2012 budget. Since the enactment of Medicare in 1965, America's seniors have no longer lived in fear of losing affordable, comprehensive health insurance when they retire. Unfortunately, some in Congress want to dismantle Medicare in order to help offset the costs of tax cuts for the very wealthiest in our country.
The House Republican budget for Fiscal Year 2012 would end Medicare as we know it and throw seniors into the private market with no more than an insufficient voucher to offset the rising cost of private health insurance. So-called "premium support" -- giving seniors a voucher of approximately $8,000 as proposed by the Republican budget -- is a reckless and irresponsible way to address the health care needs of older Americans. And it is an unacceptable means by which to finance tax cuts for those who are earning ten times or more than the retirement income of the average Medicare recipient.
Seniors, who have paid into the system their entire working lives, deserve affordable, secure health coverage upon retirement. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), in the first year of the voucher program, out-of-pocket expenses for seniors would double under the Republican plan to more than $12,500 annually. For seniors on a fixed income, a doubling of out-of-pocket expenses is simply unaffordable, particularly when the average Social Security benefit is only $14,000 per year.
The Republican budget proposal would not keep pace with the rate of inflation for health care, meaning seniors would pay ever higher out-of-pocket costs. Under the proposal, the annual increase for the vouchers will fall short of the actual rate of inflation for health care -- meaning out-of-pocket expenses for seniors will continue to soar. And to make matters worse, the Republican budget would repeal the only credible means of restraining health care costs -- the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
While deficit reduction is essential, balancing the budget by dismantling Medicare is both unfair to hard-working Americans and counterproductive. Seniors who are unable to afford Medicare or its equivalent will skip preventive services, not take necessary medication, and delay treatment leading to potentially undetected illnesses and more expensive care. If Medicare is turned into a voucher system and the health reform law is dismantled, millions of seniors will be left under- or uninsured. This will add to the burden on our nation's already overwhelmed emergency rooms and result in increased demands on Medicaid as seniors exhaust their life savings.
Before the passage of Medicare, only half of America's seniors had health insurance, and most of those with insurance only had coverage for inpatient hospital costs. Additionally, approximately 30 percent of seniors lived below the poverty line before Medicare. Now, only 1.8 percent lack health coverage and less than 9 percent live below the poverty line. We cannot afford to reverse these gains through the ultimate form of rationing health care for seniors: the replacement of Medicare as we know it with insufficient vouchers for private health coverage.
We urge you to protect America's seniors and oppose any attempts to dismantle Medicare.
Senator Sherrod Brown Senator Harry Reid
Senator Max Baucus Senator Jon Tester
Senator Mark Begich Senator Jeff Merkley
Senator Jack Reed Senator Patrick Leahy
Senator Barbara Mikulski Senator Benjamin L. Cardin
Senator Dianne Feinstein Senator John F. Kerry
Senator Daniel Kahikina Akaka Senator Barbara Boxer
Senator Jeff Bingaman Senator Charles E. Schumer
Senator Bernard Sanders Senator Mark Udall
Senator Robert Menendez Senator Debbie Stabenow
Senator Kent Conrad Senator Ron Wyden
Senator Tim Johnson Senator Richard Blumenthal
Senator Mary Landrieu Senator Frank R. Lautenberg
Senator Dick Durbin Senator Al Franken
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse Senator Tom Harkin
Senator Patty Murray Senator Chris Coons
Senator Daniel Inouye Senator Mark Warner
Senator Michael Bennet Senator Joe Manchin
Senator Claire McCaskill Senator John D. Rockefeller IV
Senator Robert P. Casey Jr. Senator Amy Klobuchar
Senator Jeanne Shaheen Senator Kirsten Gillibrand
Senator Tom Udall Senator Herb Kohl
Senator Ben Nelson Senator Jim Webb
Senator Maria Cantwell Senator Kay Hagan
Senator Mark Pryor Senator Bill Nelson