or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Public Statements

Letter To Chairman Paul Ryan, House Budget Committee

Letter

By:
Date:
Location: Washington, DC

U.S. Representative Martin Heinrich (NM-1) and other members of the House Strategic Forces Subcommittee sent a letter to House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan expressing their concern over the potentially dire consequences that the Committee's planned 2011 budget allocation would have on the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and seeking clarification of what Chairman Ryan is including in security spending.

Read the letter to House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan.

Strategic Forces Subcommittee Ranking Member Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez said, "I would like to thank Congressman Heinrich for his tremendous leadership on this issue, and I look forward to working with him to ensure that the NNSA and our national laboratories receive the resources they need to carry out their national security missions."

Rep. Heinrich recently voted against the House Republicans' budget plan pointing to the fact that the one size fits all proposal would reduce all non-security discretionary spending back to 2008 levels or lower--putting vital funding for National Laboratories in New Mexico on the chopping block.

Rep. Heinrich said in a statement, "This is an example of why a one size fits all approach to reducing our deficit is not wise. While I'm in favor of reducing government spending, installations critical to our national security, which are also successful economic drivers, like Sandia National Labs shouldn't take the hit. The success of Sandia's mission has a tremendous impact on central New Mexico's local economy. Impeding the work being done at our national labs won't grow our economy and certainly won't create jobs."

Below is a copy of the letter:

Dear Chairman Ryan:

We write to express our concerns regarding the potentially dire consequences that the Budget Committee's planned 2011 budget allocation would have on the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and to seek clarification on what you are including in security spending. The fiscal year 2011 (FY 11) budget allocations for non-security discretionary spending that you intend to submit to the Congressional Record may negatively affect our nation's nuclear deterrent and disrupting non proliferation programs that are vital to our national security.

NNSA is responsible for maintaining a safe, secure, and reliable arsenal of nuclear weapons and capabilities for deterrence to defend the United States and its allies; reducing the global threat proposed by nuclear weapons, nuclear proliferation, and unsecured or excess nuclear materials; and providing safe and effective nuclear propulsion for the U.S. Navy.

Despite these important national security methods, the NNSA -- which is part of the Department of Energy-- may be reduced to FY08 or less for remainder of the FY11, if it is currently considered "non-security spending". Although House Resolution 38 does not define "non-security spending", the chairman of the House Rules Committee described it as spending other than defense, military construction, veterans or homeland security spending. This description would omit NNSA from security spending.

Strengthening nuclear threat reduction efforts remains our first line of defense to reduce the risk of nuclear terrorism. Failing to secure or remove bomb-grade where they are most vulnerable will unnecessarily the likelihood that terrorists or countries hostile to the United States will acquire nuclear weapon capability. President Obama has prioritized these urgent efforts, promising to secure all vulnerable fissile fuel by 2013.

Similarly, maintaining a safe, secure and reliable nuclear deterrent is a national security priority. The Secretary of Defense stated in 1903, "The United States must make must needed improvements to rebuild our aging nuclear infrastructure, both facilities and personnel" and the Administration committed $84 billion to modernize the nation's nuclear weapons complex and perform warhead life extension programs. In support of these plans, the House and Senate Armed Services Committee authorized $7 billion in FY11 for NNSA Weapons Activites, a considerable increase in spending from the FY08 level and the continuing Appropriations Act for FY11 allowed NNSA to spend at its proposed FY11 level.

Furthermore, the U.S. Navy relies on NASA's Naval Reactors program to provide safe and reliable nuclear reactor plants for its nuclear-powered submarines and aircraft carriers-- which constitute 40 percent of the nation's combatants. As the Navy begins its Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine replacement program, greater demands will be placed on NNSA to design and build a new reactor plants to meet the navy's requirements.

These three programs underpin important work carried out at the Lawrence, Livermore, Los Alamos, and Sandia National laboratories as well as other laboratories and production facilities across the nation. Maintaining workforce stability and necessary scientific and engineering excellence is critical to a strong nuclear deterrent and making progress on nonproliferation.

We believe NNSA's responsibilities are germane to our national security. We, therefore, urge the Budget Committee to clarify and include specific security exemptions for NNSA weapons activities, nonproliferation programs, and naval reactors that are vital to our national security.

Sincerely,

Loretta Sanchez
Rick Larsen
John Garamendi
Ben Sutton
Jim Langevin
Martin Heinrich
Dutch Ruppersberger


Source:
Back to top