or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Public Statements

Letter To The Honorable Thomas P. D'Agostino, Adminstrator of National Nuclear Administration, United States Department of Energy

Members of the Tennessee Delegation are continuing to express their concerns to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) about the potential consolidation of the management contracts at the Y-12 Plant, the Pantex Plant in Texas, and the Savannah River Tritium Operations in South Carolina.

U.S. Sens. Lamar Alexander and Bob Corker, and U.S. Reps. Zach Wamp, Lincoln Davis, John Tanner, John Duncan, Jim Cooper, Marsha Blackburn, Phil Roe and Bart Gordon wrote to NNSA Administrator Thomas D'Agostino expressing their concern that combining the contracts will jeopardize the sites' ability to execute national security missions.

Sen. Alexander is scheduled to meet with NNSA Administrator Thomas D'Agostino on November 8 to discuss his concerns that the consolidation would delay modernization of American nuclear weapons facilities and require changes to the security contract and pension plans at Y-12 that don't make sense. Sen. Bob Corker has discussed the matter with D'Agostino as well.
Rep. Zach Wamp recently spoke with Daniel Poneman, Deputy Secretary of Energy, to express his concern that a combined contract would have far reaching ramifications--changing the way Y-12 conducts business at a critical time, and potentially jeopardizing the future of the Uranium Processing Facility and significantly adding to its cost.

Rep. Lincoln Davis has and will continue to communicate with Secretary of Energy Steven Chu, D'Agostino, as well as General Garrett Harencak to express his concerns and insistence that any plan NNSA moves forward with must protect the core mission and workers at Y-12, and the completion of UPF to garner congressional support.

Text of letter:

The Honorable Thomas P. D'Agostino
Administrator
National Nuclear Security Administration
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20585-0001

Dear Administrator D'Agostino,

We are writing to ask that you extend the individual contracts for the Y-12 Plant, the Pantex Plant, and the Savannah River Tritium operations in a manner consistent with the extensions provided to NNSA laboratory facilities. We are concerned that the current NNSA strategy for consolidating operations and construction management at these sites will jeopardize their execution of national security missions. Extending the individual contracts would be a more responsible approach.

NNSA must meet its Department of Defense goals given our nation's dependence on an extended nuclear deterrence strategy. Further, modernizing our nuclear deterrent is even more important given the President's desire to ratify the New START Treaty with the Russian Federation. Consolidating the operating contracts of these facilities would likely hinder NNSA's ability to meet DoD goals and modernize our nuclear deterrent for several reasons:

*Nuclear work is complicated and safety is critical. There will be a significant and lengthy disruption to the current and future site leadership and workforce as their operating contractors focus on a new competition for a consolidated contract. Such a distraction must be well planned and properly timed to avoid unnecessary risk.

*Consolidation would disrupt the completion of long-delayed, essential infrastructure improvements at these sites. The Uranium Processing Facility at Y-12 and the High Explosives Pressing Facility at Pantex are well underway and critical to modernizing our nuclear deterrent. Changing contractors midstream will result in delays and additional costs, not savings.

*NNSA, without performing any analysis of which we are aware, appears to have assumed that joint operations will lower the cost of pension and security contracts. These significant operating costs should be better analyzed and discussed with Congress prior to any related action by NNSA.

*Extensions of the current contracts would be consistent with the Department of Energy's extension of nearly every laboratory contract. The production plants have increased workloads and are being asked to do more with less. The net benefit of competing these contracts appears to be marginal at best based on your outstanding rating of the contractors currently contractors currently operating these sites during the last five years and their demonstrated willingness to embrace your drive to increase performance.

We applaud your efforts to achieve greater efficiencies and effectiveness at these sites. Timing this effort correctly with proper alignment of resources can accomplish your goals without hindering efforts to modernize our nuclear deterrent and maintain the skilled workforce at each of these sites. Extending the individual contracts for these sites on a long term basis is a more responsible approach for the operation of our weapons plants, and we hope you will do so as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

Lamar Alexander
United States Senator

Bob Corker
United States Senator

Zach Wamp
Member of Congress

Lincoln Davis
Member of Congress

John Tanner
Member of Congress

John J. Duncan
Member of Congress

Jim Cooper
Member of Congress

Marsha Blackburn
Member of Congress

Phil Roe
Member of Congress

Bart Gordon
Member of Congress


Source:
Back to top