or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Public Statements

Transcript of Pelosi, Reid, and Hoyer Remarks Following Meeting at White House

Press Conference

By:
Date:
Location: Washington, DC

Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer held a press availability this afternoon following a bipartisan meeting at the White House with President Obama to discuss the oil spill in the Gulf, jobs legislation, financial services reform, and energy legislation. Below is a transcript of the press availability:

BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT

Speaker Pelosi. Thank you, Mr. Leader. I join you in appreciating the meeting that we just had with President Obama. The focus was, of course, on the oil spill. It was on jobs and it was on deficit reduction. Mr. Leader Hoyer will talk about some of the -- how we calendar some of the legislation that was referenced by Leader Reid. But I want to focus on the oil spill.

It is clear that there was a lack of integrity on the part of British -- of BP -- when it came to what it told us about the adequacy of their technology, the sufficiency of blowout prevention, and the capacity to clean up. I'm very pleased that the President has sent the Attorney General to the region to see what the culpability is there, in that respect, to integrity. In terms of safety of the workers who were on the rigs and safety of those who were involved in cleanup, this is an important part of legislation we will have as we move forward.

When the subject is about leasing, we have to reform it. I commend the Administration for moving forward already in breaking up MMS, Mineral Management [Service] -- so that we can go forward in a way that is a good match for the challenge that we have -- whether it's how leases are granted, what the appropriateness is of the royalties, and eliminating royalty holidays that are now.

There are many issues that relate to additional research that is needed to get the technology in order to extract if that's where we want to go, issues that relate to private sector preparedness, to work -- with whoever is taking the lead on it -- be it BP or relating to public efforts in this regard.

So it's about leasing, it's about liability, it's about worker protections, it's about going forward in a way that holds the perpetrator accountable -- accountable to the U.S. taxpayer. We will hold BP accountable to the U.S. taxpayer. We will hold them accountable to the businesses in the region -- whether they are fishermen, or have tourism as their trade, or whatever it is. The quality of life in the region has been drastically affected. Before British Petroleum continues to spend money on its public relations campaign and its advertising and continues to give dividends -- it really should honor the commitment that it has to these small businesses. They can either wait it out with BP, which they can ill afford to do, take out loans, which they can ill afford to do, or we must insist that British Petroleum honor its commitment, do what it is required by law to do.

This is a jobs issue. The energy issue is a jobs issue and calls out in a very eloquent way for a different energy policy in our country. The farther down we have to go to extract a commodity, the more dangerous and risky it is. As the President has said in his Inaugural Address: We will look to the wind, and the sun, and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories. We have to do this. And that is what a new energy climate change piece of legislation must do.

We passed our bill in the House, we look forward to the bill being passed in the Senate and to go to conference to resolve our differences. But in the meantime, legislation is needed on leasing, liability, worker protection -- those kinds of issues that address the challenge that we face in the Gulf. We have to do all of this in a way that is fiscally sound, so that we're not adding to the debt of our country, but in fact, decreasing it.

Q: Senator McConnell said cap and trade is dead. Can you want to comment on that? He said it will never pass.

Speaker Pelosi. That's not the bill that they have in the Senate. They don't have a cap and trade bill. That's not the bill they have in the Senate.

BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT

Q: Just to be clear, even if they didn't use the words cap and trade, did the Republicans make it clear that they opposed the energy legislation as it stands?

House Majority Leader Hoyer. Senator McConnell indicated he was against the energy tax. He didn't say he was opposed to the energy legislation per se. I may speculate that he is but I don't think thatÂ…

Speaker Pelosi. Whatever it is, the fact is, as the President has said, countries recognize that the country that is ahead in the green economy will be the nation that leads the global economy. He then said that we want our country -- America -- to be that nation.

And so, you can't ignore the fact that we have an environmental challenge. But this is national security issue. It is a jobs issue. And it is something that we have a responsibility to do. How it works out is a matter -- is the legislative process. But to say we do not want to be the leader in the green economy and therefore have global economic leadership -- to say that we do not want to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and fossil fuels, which degrade our environment, is a debate that we welcome.

And this event in the Gulf shows so eloquently the need for us to have a new energy policy. The deeper we dig and go all the way into the earth to extract, the more dangerous and risky it is. The wind, the sun, the soil -- that's where we should be looking for renewables.

In the meantime, we have to transition, and that's what we have to have a national debate about, before calling such initiative dead, recognize that is on the wrong side of the future. If you have a better idea -- put it on the table. Put it on the table.


Source:
Back to top