or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Public Statements

Letter to The Honorable Ken Salazar

Letter

By:
Date:
Location: Washington, DC

Idaho's Congressional Delegation and Governor C.L. "Butch" Otter are calling on Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to stand firm on his department's justified "warranted but precluded" ruling regarding protections for sage grouse. In a letter to Salazar sent today, Idaho Senators Mike Crapo and Jim Risch, Congressman Mike Simpson and Walt Minnick, and Governor Otter pointed to Idaho's wide-ranging, collaborative on-the-ground efforts that have improved habitat for the sage grouse and provide rationale for the agency's determinations about listing.

"In 1996, the State of Idaho became one of the first states in the country to develop a comprehensive plan for conserving the species and its habitat," wrote the Governor and Delegation members. "It amended the plan in 2006, and that has led to the prioritization and implementation of numerous conservation actions for the benefit of the species."

Noting that Interior's ruling is now facing a court challenge, the Delegation and Governor said that Secretary Salazar is to be commended for his determination--and he should stand by his decision concerning sage grouse. "We need to ensure that our collective attention to this important issue does not wane or is overshadowed by inaction in the coming months," the Idahoans wrote.

The Honorable Ken Salazar
Secretary
U.S. Department of the Interior
1849 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20240

Dear Secretary Salazar:

As you know, the recent determination by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) that the greater sage-grouse is "warranted but precluded" from the protections afforded by the Endangered Species Act (ESA) directly impacts the State of Idaho. While we are concerned about the long-term implications of a warranted determination, we are encouraged that the "warranted but precluded" determination will continue to allow the Department of the Interior to work closely with states, private landowners, and other partners on collaborative solutions for conserving the species and its habitat so that there is no need to list the species in the future. We believe these partnerships are key to any effort to protect species, and we strongly encourage you to stand behind the FWS decision and fully defend it against any attempt to frustrate these voluntary efforts.

The State of Idaho has been a leader in developing and implementing collaborative solutions to conserve this iconic species and maintain predictable levels of land use. In 1996, the State of Idaho became one of the first states in the country to develop a comprehensive plan for conserving the species and its habitat. It amended the plan in 2006, and that has led to the prioritization and implementation of numerous conservation actions for the benefit of the species. Moreover, the State recently completed the nation's first Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances ("CCAA") for the species and plans to complete two additional CCAA/CCAs in the coming months.

While the "warranted but precluded" status will provide more time for Idaho and other states to make further advances in sage-grouse conservation, we need to ensure that our collective attention to this important issue does not wane or is overshadowed by inaction in the coming months.

Unfortunately, the same environmental group who challenged the Service's 2005 decision to not list the species is seeking to amend its original Complaint to challenge the "precluded" portion of the Service's decision. Plaintiff's request, if granted, would flout the important procedural requirements necessary for prosecuting claims against the Federal government. The State of Idaho and its congressional delegation strongly urges you to instruct the Department of Justice to oppose plaintiff's request, as an adverse decision would place much of this important conservation work in jeopardy.

In closing, there is reason to hope that Federal and State partnerships can maintain and improve viable populations of this iconic species while also maintaining predictable levels of land use. We believe that only through close coordination on the matters discussed above can we collectively achieve these important objectives.

Sincerely,

C.L. "Butch" Otter
Mike Crapo
Jim Risch
Mike Simpson
Walt Minnick


Source:
Back to top