Department Of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010

Floor Speech

Date: Dec. 17, 2009
Location: Washington, DC

BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT

Mr. LIEBERMAN. I thank the Chair.

Mr. President, I am honored to stand and speak on behalf of this amendment which I have filed with Senator Rockefeller and Senator Whitehouse, and I thank them for their leadership.

I wish to speak for a few moments about it. It is not a noncontroversial amendment, but I think it redeems one of the two central promises or goals of this bill. The fact is that a lot of the current health care reform debate in fact is focused on issues that are not central to two big goals that I think most of us share, which are, first, to expand the number of people who have health insurance coverage in our country; secondly, to lower the costs, because the costs continue to go up way beyond the rate of general inflation in our country, and that has a very burdensome effect on millions of individuals, families, businesses, our government--indeed, our entire economy.

This amendment focuses on the second of those two big shared goals, which is containing the increases in health care costs. It has become a mantra around here--but it is never bad to repeat a mantra--which is that national health expenditures in our country are now well over $2 trillion. It is hard to imagine that amount of money, but let me try to get inside it.

We spend twice as much per person on health care as the average developed country in the world, but I am afraid we are not receiving as a country the best value for our health care spending. The fact is that the United States provides some of the best health care in the world, but we don't provide it to all of our people and we don't provide it efficiently. Medicare and Medicaid account for over 20 percent of the Federal budget and over 27 percent of national health expenditures. These two programs are expected to rise to equal 20 percent or one-fifth of our gross domestic product by 2050.

Here is the animating, motivating fact that brings Senator Rockefeller, Senator Whitehouse, and me together to file this amendment: The Medicare trust fund, which provides Medicare benefits to approximately 37 million senior Americans that they depend on, that they have depended on in a way that has helped to extend their lives as average life expectancy goes up, the Medicare trust fund is expected to be insolvent, out of money, bankrupt, by 2017--unable to pay the bills by 2017. That is 8 years from now. It is to prevent that unacceptable result that my colleagues and I come forth to file this amendment to make sure that by then--we have done a lot of things, but one of them is to make the delivery of health care more efficient, the delivery of health care to seniors through Medicare more efficient, so they can look forward with confidence to having Medicare coverage throughout the rest of their lives.

As we all know, it is not just the ones on Medicare now; the baby boomers are coming of age to get on Medicare, and that will add enormously to its responsibilities.

I would say that Senators Reid, Baucus, Dodd, and Harkin did a superb job, a very good job, with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the underlying bill, to reduce health care spending and particularly to do so while expanding coverage for 30 million more Americans, which is the second great goal that I believe we all share. While these numbers are encouraging, Senators Rockefeller, Whitehouse, and I think we can and should do more, and that is the cost containment numbers.

My colleagues introduced earlier this year the MedPAC Reform Act, which created an independent authority, a separate nonpartisan body, to make critical health care cost decisions or make recommendations about them. In the current Senate health care reform bill, their idea appears centrally as the independent Medicare advisory board. It will bring together a panel of experts whose mission it will be to extend the solvency of the Medicare trust fund by seeking out new efficiencies, new cost containments, and improving the quality of care delivered by Medicare in the private sector. The board will have the authority to make recommendations to the President and Congress to reduce Medicare spending in particular ways. Those recommendations will be fast tracked through Congress with strict requirements for the committees of jurisdiction to review them, report the recommendations to the full Congress, and then be subject, those recommendations, to limited floor debate, limited by the underlying legislation. If Congress does not pass the advisory board's recommendations or adopt other proposals that produce an equivalent amount of savings, the Secretary of Health and Human Services will be required to implement the board's original recommendations.

As Senator Rockefeller said--this is the second time today I have said this--earlier today the Homeland Security Governmental Affairs Committee held a hearing on efforts to establish a commission to begin to turn around the exploding national debt we have. Part of the reason we do that and part of the reason this independent board outside of Congress is being created is that we haven't proven ourselves capable of controlling costs because we find it a lot easier to say yes to people, for good reasons, for humane reasons, but don't find it so easy to pay for the resulting costs of our affirmative answers to their requests.

The CBO has estimated that the advisory board in the current bill will save $23 billion in the next 10 years. The Obama administration and dozens of respected economists have said that the creation of this board is instrumental in lowering costs and literally saving Medicare from bankruptcy. The amendment I have filed with Senators Rockefeller and Whitehouse, I am convinced--certainly our intention is to make this independent board stronger so it will result in larger savings and contain more costs over the long run.

There are six provisions in the amendment that I want to denote, describe briefly. First, this amendment will extend the board's authority to cover hospitals and hospices; sensitive, I know, but the board must have the authority to consider the entire breadth of Medicare expenditures in making its recommendations to Congress to maximize savings for the government, for taxpayers and, most of all, for the beneficiaries of Medicare so the program is still there to help them.

Second, our amendment makes it easier for the board to make recommendations in the years beyond 2019 than the underlying bill does so that it can continue to monitor Medicare over the longer term and ensure its long-term solvency. We want those on Medicare now, and those coming on Medicare, to be able to depend on it over the course of their lives.

Third, this amendment will raise the amount of savings the board must meet in years where Medicare growth exceeds the target growth rate set in the law, in the proposal.

Fourth, we move up the time of implementation of the board's recommendations by 2 months to minimize, frankly, the influence of interest groups who will be in the normal course of the process fighting to stop these cost-effective recommendations.

Fifth, the amendment allows the board to offer recommendations in years where the Medicare growth rate does not outpace the target growth rate. The goal of this provision is to be clear that the purpose of the board is not just to contain costs beyond a certain standard but also to search out constantly for inefficiencies, for waste, for the expenditure of Medicare dollars that is not actually benefiting Medicare recipients.

Finally, our amendment clarifies that the purpose of the board is not just to contain costs within Medicare but to look more broadly at health care spending outside of these publicly supported programs. That is very significant. It will provide an opportunity for broad savings in health care and health insurance for pretty much everybody in our country.

I am proud to join today with my friends, Senators ROCKEFELLER and WHITEHOUSE, to announce the filing of our amendment. These six provisions will make this advisory board stronger and reduce costs.

While we disagree on some aspects of health care reform, I hope we can agree across party lines that health care spending is out of control, and that we can contain it in a way that doesn't threaten access or benefits. We must preserve and extend Medicare for future generations, and we must ensure that the new private market we are creating in health care reform is one where health care quality and efficiency justifies the cost.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator has spoken for 10 minutes.

Mr. LIEBERMAN. I wonder if I could ask unanimous consent for an additional moment.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. In my capacity as a Senator from Minnesota, I object.

Mr. LIEBERMAN. Really. OK. I won't take it personally.

I thank the Chair.

BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT


Source
arrow_upward