CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2009 -- (House of Representatives - January 14, 2009)
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin. Madam Speaker, today is the beginning of a new Congress. Our new President hasn't even taken the oath of office and we are throwing fiscal discipline out the door. This whole idea of PAYGO is gone. It doesn't exist. It is a charade.
Let's take a look at what this bill actually does. This bill proposes to add all these new kids on the SCHIP program, and then in the out-years it shoves them off a cliff, taking 7 million children off of the SCHIP program. They do this only to carve and jam this bill into compliance with PAYGO.
I received a letter from the CBO just this morning that if this bill was actually carried through, if you didn't kick all of these children off of this program, it would cost $42 billion more. This bill has a $42 billion deficit hole in it. The spending increase in SCHIP in this bill increases on average 23 percent a year. Madam Speaker, Medicare is going bankrupt according to the trustees, and that increases at 6.5 percent a year.
We are being deprived of a bipartisan opportunity to extend the current SCHIP program, which would have an enormous vote here if you brought a bipartisan bill to the table. That is not what is happening. Budget gimmicks, fiscal irresponsibility, a $42 billion deficit, and the creation of a brand new entitlement program. And what is worse, we are committing our taxpayer dollars, which are so precious in this difficult economic time, to pay for insurance that people already have. 2.4 million people who already have private health insurance are going to get kicked off of their private health insurance and the taxpayers are going to pick up the tab. That is not fiscal responsibility.
Let's solve the uninsured problem. Let's come together and fix the health care problems in America. Let's not bankrupt the country. Let's not play budget gimmicks. Let's not throw PAYGO out the window. And let's not take away the health insurance that people already have and make them have government-sponsored health insurance. We should reject this bill.
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE,
Washington, DC, January 14, 2009.
Hon. Paul Ryan,
Ranking Member, Committee on the Budget, House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
DEAR CONGRESSMAN: As you requested, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated the budgetary effects of modifying H.R. 2, the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009, to extend the program's authorization through 2019 in a manner that would provide sufficient funding to allow states to meet demand for increasing enrollment within the program's parameters. If H.R. 2 were changed to authorize the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) through 2019 and to provide sufficient funding for such increasing enrollment throughout that period, CBO estimates that enacting that alternative version of the bill would increase deficits by $41.6 billion over the 2009-2019 period. In contrast, CBO estimates that the version of H.R. 2 introduced in the House of Representatives on January 13, 2009, would result in a net reduction in deficits of $0.4 billion over that 11-year period.
The introduced version of H.R. 2 would authorize CHIP through 2013 and would provide significant funding increases over the next few years, leading up to a total funding level of $17.4 billion in 2013. The program's funding for the second half of fiscal year 2013 would be $3 billion. Under baseline rules, that amount annualized--$6 billion--would be projected for each subsequent year. The estimated cost of the bill assumes that funding level for CHIP for fiscal years 2014 through 2019. On that basis, CBO estimates that the introduced version of H.R. 2 would increase federal direct spending by $73.3 billion through 2019, including the costs of other provisions in the bill. (That spending would be offset by increases in federal tax revenues totaling $73.6 billion over the same period, primarily from increases in the excise taxes levied on tobacco products.)
As an alternative to the introduced version of H.R. 2, you requested that CBO assume the CHIP rules and structure as currently delineated in H.R. 2 would remain unchanged through 2019 and that sufficient funding would be made available after 2013 to accommodate projected enrollment growth. The projected enrollment growth is based on expected growth in the total population, as well as changes in the health insurance market and the economy as a whole. Under those assumptions, CBO estimates that average monthly enrollment in CHIP would rise from about 9 million in 2013 to about 12 million in 2019.
Based on the assumptions you specified, CBO estimates total changes in direct spending of $115.2 billion, as compared with the $73.3 billion increase we estimate for the introduced version of H.R. 2. (Revenue increases would remain unchanged.) Thus, the net budget impact of a modified version of H.R. 2, as you specified, would be an increase in deficits totaling $41.6 billion over the 2009-2019 period.
If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased to provide them. The CBO staff contacts are Robert Stewart and Sean Dunbar.
Robert A. Sunshine,
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT