or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Public Statements

Hearing of the Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee - Intellectual Property Act of 2007

Statement

By:
Date:
Location: Washington, DC

Hearing of the Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee - Intellectual Property Act of 2007

BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT

REP. LINDA T. SANCHEZ (D-CA): I will make a statement in about two minutes, if I may.

REP. BERMAN: Oh, you've got it.

REP. SANCHEZ: I just would like to say that the hearing we had in October I thought was a good one, focusing on international piracy and what could bring us together. I -- one of the things I note is that when we inspect less than 1 percent of the containers coming into the United States, we're not -- this bill is not going to stop the piracy that we see that infuriates us, in -- especially in China and in Russia.

There are parts of this bill that I think are important. I would like to say I'm deeply troubled by Section 104, and I would ask unanimous consent to put in the record a letter signed by myself, Congressman Sensenbrenner and Congressman Boucher, including a letter signed by 25 law professors, intellectual property law professors, expressing concern on Section 104.

I do believe, as Mr. Boucher has --

REP. BERMAN: That will be included in the record.

REP. SANCHEZ: -- thank you -- has indicated, that the statutory damages are -- would have the effect of chilling innovation and preventing economic growth, and it's a grave concern to me. There are other elements of the bill that I'm sure we can work together on, but I -- absent some modification that would -- you know, these statutory damages would provide for $1.5 million in statutory damages for a single CD, I think that's unreasonable.

And I look forward to continuing to work with my friend from California on this, and I yield back.

REP. BERMAN: I can't resist just putting out that the 104 authority is a discretionary authority. It is not a mandate.

REP. SANCHEZ: If I -- just noting, the courts have plenty of discretion right now, and this section is unnecessary. But we'll have a long dialogue on this, I am sure.

BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT


Source:
Back to top