HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACE MODERNIZATION AND AFFORDABILITY ACT OF 2006
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
Mr. COBURN. Mr. President, first of all, thank you for taking my stead in the Chair this evening so I could participate in this debate. I have been in the Chair 2 hours and 30 minutes and have heard quite a range of things.
Health care is a problem that affects the whole country today. We are going to spend in our Nation $2.3 trillion this year. The largest amount of money we are going to spend on anything in our country, we are going to spend on health care, and one out of every three dollars we spend does not help anybody get well.
We ought to ask ourselves--with 45 million people truly not covered in an insurance product, with the cost of health care rising double digits every year, with the cost of drugs skyrocketing, with the cost of hospitalization, emergency care skyrocketing--how is it we are spending all this money, with $1 out of every $3 not helping somebody get well, and costs are going through the roof?
It is because we have some real structural problems. This bill is meant to address a small portion of that. It is not the end-all, answer-all to our problems in health care. We all realize that. But this is something we can do in the short term that will make available an opportunity for costs to be controlled in a small area of our economy that will have impact and will create accessibility.
I would say we all in this body want everybody to have access to health care. The question is, Who pays for it? Right now, in terms of Medicare, our grandchildren are paying for it because it ran a $120 billion deficit last year. In other words, we borrowed $120 billion to run Medicare last year because that is the amount of money we did not have coming in from Medicare premiums.
The whole question on how we address health care is going to be: How do we get a better system that will give more people access, that does not waste that $1 out of $3? That is what we have to be concerned with. We have the brains, we have the science, we have the facilities, but something is wrong. What is wrong is there is not a competitive system out there where we allocate scarce resources based on quality and value and price.
This bill will move a little bit in that direction. There are going to be a lot of areas where we move. The one thing I have heard from the other side that I agree with today is, we ought to be emphasizing prevention. I agree with that 100 percent.
We have 19 different agencies in the Federal Government that have something to do with prevention. We are going to be introducing a bill that pulls all those together into one and has a leader who is emphasizing prevention and what we can teach the American people about saving money, preventive health care. As grandma used to say: An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. And it works every time.
We know we can prevent diabetes. We can stop 50 percent of diabetes just with education, but we don't have it. We are wasting resources and duplicating resources. We have opportunity costs from programs that are designed to do it and don't do it well. Others do it much better, but we are still funding the ones that don't do it well. There are lots of problems we have.
I want the American people to understand that the choice that has been outlined by those who oppose this bill today isn't a choice of whether we have to have mandates. It is a choice of somebody who has no care now, no mandate, versus getting some care. If we do our job on prevention, then we will be educating the American people. But the ultimate health care responsibility in this country isn't the Congress. It isn't the States. It is the individuals who make choices about what is going to impact their lives and what value they want on their health care. That is why HSAs, although they have been blocked, need to be expanded vastly. They need to be funded better. They need to have an application for chronic care, and they need to have a tax deductibility to bring you up to the level of that so that we put everybody's skin in the game, so you know you are going to make a choice based on what is valuable to you.
Everywhere else in this country, we have trusted markets to allocate scarce resources. We are a little timid about how they are doing it in oil, but the fact is, the market is scarce, and the price is up. As soon as either demand decreases or supply increases, the price will come back down, or some other form of energy is going to be there to supply it, such as agrifuels.
We have to trust the market to help us because we can't afford what we have promised. We can't afford what we promised in Medicaid, in Medicare. The money is not going to be there in 10 years. It is going to start winnowing away. So what are we to do? Continue to create a charade for the American people that says yes, we can, or start with one small step with this bill which offers availability through group purchasing, expanded purchasing power, lowering the overall risk to a million people? Why would we not want to do that?
Is it perfect? No. There isn't a bill we pass that is perfect. But this is a step in the right direction, although it does walk over some State mandates, I agree. But the problem is, Medicaid walks over State mandates every day. Medicare walks over State mandates every day. They set a mandate.
We have two choices in health care: the Government is going to run it all, or we go to the private sector where we really trust the market to allocate and protect those who need the help, those who can't help themselves. Those are the only two choices we have on health care. If you think we have problems now, wait until the Government runs it all.
I am a physician. I have practiced since 1983. That is 23 years. I have delivered 4,000 babies. I have done every kind of operation you can think of. I have seen a system decline based on how insurance has been applied to it and copying the mandates of the Federal Government. So we are in a mess on health care. Let's get out of the mess. Let's start with this, but let's don't stop there. Let's start with prevention. Let's make sure there is competition in the pharmaceutical industry. We don't have it.
As a practicing physician, there is no competition in the pharmaceutical industry. Drugs that do exactly the same thing and are priced the same way, nobody wants an increased market share. The Federal Trade Commission ought to be asking why. Why don't they want increased market share? I believe there is collusion on sharing of markets in the pharmaceutical industry so that they can keep the prices high. We need worldwide competition on pharmaceuticals. If we will do that, we will get a lot of bang for our buck.
There is even collusion when it comes to the generics. The FDA has created this wonderful system which enhances no competition for 6 months to 18 months for the first person who comes out with a generic. What is that all about? That is taking away from the market.
There are lots of problems, but this is a good start. It is not perfect. Is it as good as we can get? It probably is right now. But it starts us down the path on what we need to do to fix health care in this country. That is competition.
We need transparency. We have seen recently hospitals not wanting to give their rates, doctors not wanting to give rates, Medicare not wanting to publish rates. Why not? Let people know what they are supposed to be getting charged. Let's have a little open sunshine on the health care industry.
Let's talk about the 19 percent of every dollar that goes into the health insurance industry that never goes to help anybody get well. Let's talk about that. Let's create real competition in the health insurance industry. The more people get into it, the more competition we will have.
I thank the Senator for filling in for me so I could take the time to address the Senate. Our goal is making sure everybody has access to care and doing it in a way that our children can afford to pay for it because we are not paying for it today. We need to be mindful of that as we make those decisions. This bill starts with that.
I yield the floor and suggest the absence of a quorum.