or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Public Statements

Letter to U.S. Catholic Bishops

By:
Date:
Location: Washington, DC


U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops
3211 Fourth Street, NE
Washington, D.C. 20017-1194

Your Eminences and Excellencies:

We have worked closely with the u.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) on scores of issues for many years and look forward to continuing this relationship. Last November, manyMembers met with various USCCB members to discuss immigration reform. We renew the promise to keep communication open as Congress considers this complex and difficult issue.

We know you share both our frustration with the current immigration system and our interest in fixing this system in a fair and compassionate manner. Doing so will not be easy, particularly with many passionate and polarized viewpoints on this issue. Clearly, a thoughtful and respectful dialogue is needed on the issue if Congress and the public are to arrive at a consensus
and implement a workable solution.

We supported the House border security legislation (H.R. 4437) in December because it would prevent illegal immigration, help our law enforcement agents gain control of our borders, and reestablish respect for our immigration laws. Though this legislation represents a solid first step in an effort to fix a broken immigration system, it will not be the final product on this issue.

Many of the most heinous atrocities occurring along the border involve human trafficking. We wholeheartedly concur with the USCCB's statement that:
ยท Human trafficking is a modem-day form of slavery. Victims of human trafficking are
subjected to force, fraud, or coercion, for the purpose of sexual exploitation or forced
labor. Examples of recent cases of human trafficking in the u.S. include adolescent
Mexican girls trafficked to the u.s. for forced prostitution, Indian men trafficked for
forced labor, and Afucan women and children trafficked for domestic servitude, among
others. The u.S. government estimates that approximately 600,000 to 800,000 people are
trafficked across international borders each year; about 14,500-17,500 of them into the
United States. Of those trafficked into the United States, it is estimated one-third are
children. (Source: http://www.usccb.org/newslindex.shtml)

Unfortunately, our current alien-smuggling laws are inadequate in the fight against these sophisticated coyotes and snake-heads who rape, rob, beat, and abandon their human "cargo," and also poison our communities through drug trafficking. Thus, border-area U.S. Attorneyswho every day prosecute these horrific crimes against humanity - have asked for the tools in
H.R. 4437 to aid them in their fight against alien smuggling.

Since the House bill's passage, many have misconstrued the House's good-faith effort to bring human traffickers to justice as a way to criminalize humanitarian assistance efforts. The House bill does no such thing, nor did it intend to.

We can assure you, just as under current law, religious organizations would not have to "card" people at soup kitchens and homeless shelters under the House bill's anti-smuggling provisions. Prosecutors would no sooner prosecute good Samaritans for "assisting" illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S. under the House bill than they would prosecute such persons for
"encouraging" illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S. under current law, which has existed for nearly 20 years.

Nonetheless, we stand willing to work with you and other persons of good will to ensure humanitarian assistance efforts are not mistakenly ensnared in this moral effort to end suffering at the hands of human traffickers. We remain optimistic this goal can be achieved.

Lastly, we know many of you are concerned about the House bill's provision making illegal presence a felony. We share that concern. As you should know, during the House debate, Chairman Sensenbrenner offered an amendment to reduce the bill's penalty for illegal presence IToma felony to a misdemeanor. Unfortunately, this amendment was unsuccessful, primarily because all but eight of our Democratic colleagues decided to play political games by voting to
make all illegal immigrants felons. A felony penalty is neither appropriate nor workable. We remain committed to reducing this penalty and working with you to this end.

We take seriously the moral values legislators must demonstrate when discharging their public responsibilities. We sincerely hope we can work together in a cooperative manner for meaningful immigration reform that is fair, compassionate, and reflective of our shared values.

James Sensenbrenner, Jr
Henry J. Hyde
Peter T. King

http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/bishopsimmltr4506.pdf

Back to top